Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911480›Full record

ArticleNature2020

Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin.

Sebastian Michalski, Carina C de Oliveira Mann, Che A Stafford, Gregor Witte, Joseph Bartho, Katja Lammens, Veit Hornung, Karl-Peter Hopfner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian Michalski *Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8190-3855
Carina C de Oliveira Mann *Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Che A StaffordGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Gregor WitteGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-0962
Joseph BarthoGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-2347
Katja LammensGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Veit HornungGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4150-194X
Karl-Peter HopfnerGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. hopfner@genzentrum.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-8357
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) is an innate immune sensor for cytosolic microbial DNA

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAutoantigensBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesChromatinCryoelectron MicroscopyCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDNAEnzyme ActivationHistonesHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsImmunity, InnateMiceAutoantigenscGAS protein, humancGAS protein, mouseChromatinCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDNAHistonesNucleosomesNucleotidyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID32911480
OpenAlexW3083958325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.