Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911039›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2020

Provider Perceptions of a Humanizing Intervention for Health Care Workers-A Survey Study of PPE Portraits.

Jennifer Reidy, Cati Brown-Johnson, Nancy McCool, Shawna Steadman, Mary B Heffernan, Vandana Nagpal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer ReidyDivision of Palliative Care, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.reidy@umassmemorial.org.
Cati Brown-JohnsonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nancy McCoolDivision of Palliative Care, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Shawna SteadmanDivision of Palliative Care, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA; University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Nursing, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary B HeffernanDepartment of Art and Art History, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Vandana NagpalDivision of Palliative Care, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USMemorial Medical Center · USOccidental College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextReports from patients and health care workers dealing with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) underscore experiences of isolation and fear. Some of this experience results from the distancing effect of masks, gloves, and gowns known as personal protective equipment (PPE). One approach to bridging the divide created by PPE is the use of PPE portraits, postcard-sized pictures affixed to PPE.

objectivesOur confidential electronic mail-based survey aimed to quantify provider attitudes toward PPE portraits.

methodsPPE portraits were piloted at an academic safety-net health system experiencing a COVID-19 patient surge during April-May 2020, necessitating use of full PPE for COVID-positive patients and surgical masks in all hospital settings. Our survey assessed staff exposure to PPE portraits, attitudes toward PPE portraits, and potential program expansion. For staff wearing PPE portraits, we also assessed perceptions of interactions with other staff and patients/families and impact on personal well-being. The University of Massachusetts Medical School's Institutional Review Board designated this as a quality improvement project (#H00020279).

resultsMore than half of survey respondents (n = 111 of 173; 64%) reported exposure to PPE portraits. Attitudes toward PPE portraits were positive overall, with agreement that PPE portraits were a good idea (89%), improved provider mood (79%), enhanced perception of team connection (72%), and more positive among those who reported exposure. Open-ended responses (n = 41) reinforced positive survey data and also raised concerns about infection control (n = 6), cost/logistics (n = 5), and provider vulnerability (n = 3).

conclusionProviders report that PPE portraits may represent a positive patient-centered idea that helps reassure patients, is well received by interdisciplinary staff, and may enhance patient and team interactions. Potential adaptations to address concerns include photo pins and donor/patient and family experience department support for costs.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsHealth PersonnelPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralProfessional-Patient RelationsCOVID-19HumansCOVID-19patient-provider connectionpersonal protective equipmentPPEPPE portraits

Identifiers

PMID32911039
PMCPMC7476604
OpenAlexW3084440395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.