Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32910903›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2020

Perceived HIV stigma and HIV testing among men and women in rural Uganda: a population-based study.

Seth C Kalichman, Bruno Shkembi, Rhoda K Wanyenze, Rose Naigino, Moses H Bateganya, Nicholas A Menzies, Chii-Dean Lin, Haruna Lule, Susan M Kiene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. "AIDS care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seth C KalichmanInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Bruno ShkembiInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Rhoda K WanyenzeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Rose NaiginoDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses H BateganyaFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Nicholas A MenziesDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Chii-Dean LinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Haruna LuleGombe Hospital, Gombe, Uganda.
Susan M KieneDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: susankiene@gmail.com.

Funding

Enhanced Linkage to HIV Care Following Home-Based HIV Testing in Rural UgandaR01MH106391 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIENE, SUSAN MARIA, WANYENZE, RHODA KITTI · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStigma is a formidable social structural barrier to HIV testing, and yet the effect of stigma on HIV testing is rarely examined at the community level. We aimed to examine the geospatial relationships of perceived HIV stigma and HIV testing among men and women living in rural Uganda.

methodsWomen and men (aged ≥18 years or emancipated minor) residing in rural areas of Uganda who self-identified as HIV negative completed interviews that included measures of HIV testing history and how participants perceived HIV stigma. We used geospatial cluster analyses to identify areas of higher perceived stigma and lower perceived stigma and the geographical dispersion of these areas. We used Poisson regression models stratified by gender to test individual-level and community-level perceived stigma in relation to frequency of HIV testing in the previous 2 years.

findingsBetween Nov 25, 2015, and May 26, 2017, we interviewed 9740 participants (4359 [45%] men and 5381 [55%] women]), among whom 940 (9%) had never been tested for HIV, and among those who had been tested, 1131 (12%) had not been tested in the previous 2 years. Men (3134 [72%] of 4359) were less likely to have been tested in the past 2 years than women (4535 [84%] of 5381) were (p<0·001). We used Poisson regression models, reporting B coefficients, to test study hypotheses regarding the effects of individual-level and community-level stigma on HIV testing frequency counts. Multilevel modelling showed that women showed significant individual-level (B=-0·173, p<0·001) and community-level (B=-0·223, p<0·001) associations between lower stigma predicting higher rates of HIV testing. For men, lower individual-level perceived stigma was also associated with higher testing frequency (B=-0·030, p=0·018), whereas higher community-level perceived stigma was associated with higher testing frequency (B=0·077, p=0·008).

interpretationOur results suggest that perceived HIV stigma at the community level exerts a differential influence on testing for women and men. HIV testing campaigns that are targeted to men and women in rural Uganda will require gender tailoring to fit local contexts.

fundingUS National Institute of Mental Health.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural HealthSocial StigmaAdolescentAdultFemaleGeography, MedicalHIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32910903
PMCPMC9706443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.