ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2020
Medical consumerism and the modern patient: successful ageing, self-management and the 'fantastic prosumer'.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-purchase behavioral intention in medical aesthetic: the role of image, perceived value, and satisfaction.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- "Click and mortar" opportunities for digitization and consumerism in trials.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Telepsychiatry in an Era of Digital Mental Health Startups.Current psychiatry reports · 2023Review
- Medical consumerism in the UK, from 'citizen's challenge' to the 'managed consumer'-A symbol without meaning?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Review
- Information or Habit: What Health Policy Makers Should Know about the Drivers of Self-Medication among Romanians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Can we get back to Brexit?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.