Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32910868›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2020

Projected spending for brand-name drugs in English primary care given US prices: a cross-sectional study.

Michael Liu, Brian MacKenna, William B Feldman, Alex J Walker, Jerry Avorn, Aaron S Kesselheim, Ben Goldacre

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Can we get back to Brexit?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael LiuThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-8797
Brian MacKennaThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-9063
William B Feldman1811Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA.
Alex J WalkerThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-6135
Jerry Avorn1811Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA.
Aaron S Kesselheim1811Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA.
Ben GoldacreThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

RESPIRATORY RESEARCHT32HL007633 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI George R Washko · 1985 to 2026
$14.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate additional spending if NHS England paid the same prices as US Medicare Part D for the 50 single-source brand-name drugs with the highest expenditure in English primary care in 2018.

designRetrospective analysis of 2018 drug prescribing and spending in the NHS England prescribing data and the Medicare Part D Drug Spending Dashboard and Data. We examined the 50 costliest drugs in English primary care available as brand-name-only in the US and England. We performed cost projections of NHS England spending with US Medicare Part D prices. We estimated average 2018 US rebates as 1 minus the quotient of net divided by gross Medicare Part D spending.

settingEngland and US.

participantsNHS England and US Medicare systems.

main outcome measuresTotal spending, prescriptions and claims in NHS England and Medicare Part D. All spending and cost measures were reported in 2018 British pounds.

resultsNHS England spent £1.39 billion on drugs in the cohort. All drugs were more expensive under US Medicare Part D than NHS England. The US-England price ratios ranged from 1.3 to 9.9 (mean ratio 4.8). Accounting for prescribing volume, if NHS England had paid US Medicare Part D prices after adjusting for estimated US rebates, it would have spent 4.6 times as much in 2018 on drugs in the cohort (£6.42 billion).

conclusionsSpending by NHS England would be substantially higher if it paid US Medicare Part D prices. This could result in decreased access to medicines and other health services.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDrug CostsEnglandForecastingHumansMedicare Part DPrimary Health CareState MedicineUnited StatesBrexitdrug costsPrimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID32910868
PMCPMC7488930
OpenAlexW3086487041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.