ReviewEuropean journal of rheumatology2021
Acute coronary syndrome in Behcet's syndrome: A systematic review.
Review in European journal of rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Manifestations in Behçet's Syndrome.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Acute Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Left Main Occlusion in a Patient with Behçet Disease.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Giant Coronary Pseudoaneurysm Due to Behçet's Disease.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Recurrent left main stem stenosis in a young female with Behçet's aortitis: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Infliximab in the Treatment of a Giant Coronary Aneurysm in Behçet's Disease.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2024Article
- Coronary Vasculitis.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Treatment and Imaging Modalities of Giant Coronary Aneurysms Resulting from Kawasaki Disease and Presenting as Acute Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction.Case reports in cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behcet syndrome is a rare vasculitis that affects both arteries and veins. Vasculo-Bechet Syndrome (VBS) is seen predominantly in men. Genetic predisposition and immune dysregulation leading to inflammation, endothelial damage, and impaired fibrinolysis contribute to its pathogenesis. Isolated case reports of Behcet syndrome (BS) with associated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been reported in the past. In this study, we present the first systematic review of such cases. A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases from 1980-2018 to identify case reports of myocardial infarction associated with BS. Cases that fulfilled the criteria for BS were selected for analysis. Demographic data, electrocardiography, echocardiography, angiography findings, and management were analyzed when available. We identified 62 case reports. Most subjects were men with a mean age of 37 years. Twenty-one percent were smokers, but other traditional cardiovascular risk factors were less common. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in half of the cases with findings on electrocardiogram (ECG). Echocardiogram revealed wall motion abnormality in 76% of patients, and angiography showed double-vessel disease in more than half of the cases. Mortality was reported in 1.6% of the cases. This systematic review shows that ACS in BS affects young males with low prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors. Chest pain is the most common presenting feature and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the most common ECG finding. Immunotherapy may be helpful to prevent future ACS in these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.