Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32910229›Full record

SynthesisPediatric radiology2021

Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kossi D Abalo, Estelle Rage, Klervi Leuraud, David B Richardson, Hubert Ducou Le Pointe, Dominique Laurier, Marie-Odile Bernier

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Utilization of Imaging in Young Athletes with Low Back Pain.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiation Exposure During Contrast-Enhanced Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies in Dogs and Cats.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Gamma radiation detector selection for CT scanner.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kossi D AbaloLaboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France. kossi.abalo@irsn.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5064-0215
Estelle RageLaboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Klervi LeuraudLaboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
David B RichardsonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hubert Ducou Le PointeDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Hôpital d'Enfants Armand-Trousseau APHP, Paris, France.
Dominique LaurierResearch Department on Biological and Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Marie-Odile BernierLaboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIonizing radiation use for medical diagnostic purposes has substantially increased over the last three decades. Moderate to high doses of radiation are well established causes of cancer, especially for exposure at young ages. However, cancer risk from low-dose medical imaging is debated.

objectiveTo review the literature on cancer risks associated with prenatal and postnatal medical diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure among children and to assess this risk through a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search of five electronic databases supplemented by a hand search was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2019, including patients younger than 22 years of age exposed to medical imaging ionizing radiation. Pooled odds ratio (OR

resultsTwenty-four studies were included. For prenatal exposure (radiographs or CT), no significant increased risk was reported for all cancers, leukemia and brain tumors. For postnatal exposure, increased risk was observed only for CT, mostly for leukemia (ERR

conclusionCT exposure in childhood appears to be associated with increased risk of cancer while no significant association was observed with diagnostic radiographs.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation ExposureChildFemaleHumansPregnancyRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingRadiographyCancerChildrenComputed tomographyIonizing radiationPostnatalPrenatalRadiographyRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.