ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Combating Health Care Fraud and Abuse: Conceptualization and Prototyping Study of a Blockchain Antifraud Framework.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Smart Contracts and Shared Platforms in Sustainable Health Care: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Blockchain applications in health care for COVID-19 and beyond: a systematic review.The Lancet. Digital health · 2021Pooled it
- Applications of Blockchain in the Medical Field: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Acceptance of Smart Contracts in Patients Receiving Primary Care: Exploratory Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Fraud detection and explanation in medical claims using GNN architectures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Using large language models for enhanced fraud analysis and detection in blockchain based health insurance claims.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MIPS Under Scrutiny: Exploring the Association Between Providers With Fraudulent Practices and Quality Metrics Within MACRA's Framework.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Observational
- Blockchain Applications in Core Healthcare Services: Patient Data, Research, and Institutional Processes.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2025Article
- Comprehensive promotion of drug traceability codes in China in 2025: challenges and solutions for tertiary outpatient pharmacists.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Automatic Recommender System of Development Platforms for Smart Contract-Based Health Care Insurance Fraud Detection Solutions: Taxonomy and Performance Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Enhancing EHR Interoperability and Security through Distributed Ledger Technology: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Designing A Blockchain-Empowered Telehealth Artifact for Decentralized Identity Management and Trustworthy Communication: Interdisciplinary Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Architectural Design of a Blockchain-Enabled, Federated Learning Platform for Algorithmic Fairness in Predictive Health Care: Design Science Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn estimated US $2.6 billion loss is attributed to health care fraud and abuse. With traditional health care claims verification and reimbursement, the health care provider submits a claim after rendering services to a patient, which is then verified and reimbursed by the payer. However, this process leaves out a critical stakeholder: the patient for whom the services are actually rendered. This lack of patient participation introduces a risk of fraud and abuse. Blockchain technology enables secure data management with transparency, which could mitigate this risk of health care fraud and abuse.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to develop a framework using blockchain to record claims data and transactions in an immutable format and to enable the patient to act as a validating node to help detect and prevent health care fraud and abuse.
methodsWe developed a health care fraud and abuse blockchain technical framework and prototype using key blockchain tools and application layers including consensus algorithms, smart contracts, tokens, and governance based on digital identity on the Ethereum platform (Ethereum Foundation).
resultsOur technical framework maps to the claims adjudication process and focuses on Medicare claims, with the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as the central authority. A prototype of the framework system was developed using the blockchain platform Ethereum (Ethereum Foundation), with its design features, workflow, smart contract functions, system architecture, and software implementation outlined. The software stack used to build the system consisted of a front-end user interface framework, a back-end processing server, and a blockchain network. React was used for the user interface framework, and NodeJS and an Express server were used for the back-end processing server; Solidity was the smart contract language used to interact with a local Ethereum blockchain network.
conclusionsThe proposed framework and the initial prototype have the potential to improve the health care claims process by using blockchain technology for secure data storage and consensus mechanisms, which make the claims adjudication process more patient-centric for the purposes of identifying and preventing health care fraud and abuse. Future work will focus on the use of synthetic or historic CMS claims data to assess the real-world viability of the framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.