ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020
Underrepresentation of the elderly in clinical trials, time for action.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The views of healthcare professionals and family members on deprescribing preventive medication in people living with dementia: a qualitative systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Older Adults with Variable Disease States: A Meta-analysis of Large Placebo-Controlled Trials.Drugs & aging · 2025Pooled it
- Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Trends in Patient Representation in Low Back Pain Pharmacological Randomized Clinical Trials, 2011 to 2020: A Systematic Review.The journal of pain · 2024Pooled it
- Immunotherapy in elderly head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019.BMC geriatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Age-based exclusion is common and multifactorial in spinal RCTs: a systematic review and quantitative analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023Pooled it
- What is the prevalence of fear of cancer recurrence in cancer survivors and patients? A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Psycho-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Vaccination uptake amongst older adults from minority ethnic backgrounds: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- The Invisible Barrier of Neighborhood Disadvantage in Clinical Trial Recruitment and Retention Among Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors in super-elderly patients (≥ 80 years) with type 2 diabetes: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2026Article
- Widespread inappropriate prescribing for older people with reduced kidney function: what are the harms and how do we tackle them? A scoping review for primary care.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to recruiting older adult care home residents into clinical trials of medicines and vaccines: a scoping review.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Patient-reported geriatric syndromes and their association with quality of life: findings from a cross-sectional study in German older adults.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Synchrony During Collaborative Drawing: A Longitudinal Comparison of Same Generation and Intergenerational Dyads.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Trends and Predictors of Premature Termination of Cardiovascular Trials: A Systematic Review.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Tumor biology, treatment patterns, and recurrence in breast cancer patients aged 70-79 vs ≥ 80 years: a large-scale registry analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Embracing the Digital Revolution: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Clinical Trials in Older Participants.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.