ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2021
ImmunoPET Imaging of Pancreatic Tumors with
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumors and Major Organs in Tumor-Bearing Mice.ACS nano · 2023Pooled it
- Nanotechnology-mediated podocyte injury repair: mechanistic exploration and therapeutic prospects.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Developments & Potential of Nanotechnology for the Detection and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Ferroptosis Therapy and Imaging Diagnosis in Pancreatic Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Advanced Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapy: Gold, Silver, and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Oncological Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Article
- Prospect of Gold Nanoparticles in Pancreatic Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Article
- Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directedJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery of nanoparticles.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023Article
- Development of a CLDN18.2-targeting immuno-PET probe for non-invasive imaging in gastrointestinal tumors.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Article
- Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities.Cancers · 2022Review
- Nanocarriers for pancreatic cancer imaging, treatments, and immunotherapies.Theranostics · 2022Review
- ImmunoPET: Antibody-Based PET Imaging in Solid Tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTargeted delivery in vivo remains an immense roadblock for the translation of nanomaterials into the clinic. The greatest obstacle is the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which sequesters foreign substances from general circulation and causes accumulation in organs such as the liver and spleen. The purpose of this study was to determine whether attaching an active targeting antibody, 5B1, to the surface of gold nanoparticles and using clodronate liposomes to deplete liver and splenic macrophages could help to minimize uptake by MPS organs, increase targeted delivery to CA19.9-positive pancreatic tumors, and enhance pancreatic tumor delineation. PROCEDURES: To produce the antibody-gold nanoparticle conjugate (Ab-AuNP), the Ab was conjugated to p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (p-SCN-DFO) and subsequently conjugated to NHS-activated gold nanoparticles. The Ab-AuNP was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Modified Lindmo assay was performed to assess binding affinity and internalization potential in vitro. The Ab-AuNP was radiolabeled with
resultsMice pretreated with clodronate liposomes in an orthotopic setting demonstrated decreased liver uptake at early time points (12.2 ± 2.3 % ID/g vs. 22.8 ± 3.8 % ID/g at 24 h) and increased tumor uptake at 120 h (13.8 ± 8.0 % ID/g vs. 6.0 ± 1.2 % ID/g). This allowed for delineation of orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in significantly more mice treated with clodronate (6/6) than in mice not treated with clodronate (2/6) or mice injected with gold nanoparticles labeled with a nonspecific antibody (0/5).
conclusionsThe combination of clodronate liposomes and an active targeting antibody on the surface of gold nanoparticles allowed for PET/CT imaging of subcutaneous and orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.