Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32909244›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2021

ImmunoPET Imaging of Pancreatic Tumors with

Nicholas B Sobol, Joshua A Korsen, Ali Younes, Kimberly J Edwards, Jason S Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2023
    Article
  9. Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directedJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Article
  10. Pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery of nanoparticles.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas B SobolDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joshua A KorsenDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ali YounesDepartment of Chemistry, Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Kimberly J EdwardsDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jason S LewisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. lewisj2@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-4534
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USHunter College · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Leveraging Pb-203/212 for the Theranostic Imaging and Therapy of Prostate CancerR35CA232130 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LEWIS, JASON S. · 2019 to 2025
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R35 CA232130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTargeted delivery in vivo remains an immense roadblock for the translation of nanomaterials into the clinic. The greatest obstacle is the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which sequesters foreign substances from general circulation and causes accumulation in organs such as the liver and spleen. The purpose of this study was to determine whether attaching an active targeting antibody, 5B1, to the surface of gold nanoparticles and using clodronate liposomes to deplete liver and splenic macrophages could help to minimize uptake by MPS organs, increase targeted delivery to CA19.9-positive pancreatic tumors, and enhance pancreatic tumor delineation. PROCEDURES: To produce the antibody-gold nanoparticle conjugate (Ab-AuNP), the Ab was conjugated to p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (p-SCN-DFO) and subsequently conjugated to NHS-activated gold nanoparticles. The Ab-AuNP was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Modified Lindmo assay was performed to assess binding affinity and internalization potential in vitro. The Ab-AuNP was radiolabeled with

resultsMice pretreated with clodronate liposomes in an orthotopic setting demonstrated decreased liver uptake at early time points (12.2 ± 2.3 % ID/g vs. 22.8 ± 3.8 % ID/g at 24 h) and increased tumor uptake at 120 h (13.8 ± 8.0 % ID/g vs. 6.0 ± 1.2 % ID/g). This allowed for delineation of orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in significantly more mice treated with clodronate (6/6) than in mice not treated with clodronate (2/6) or mice injected with gold nanoparticles labeled with a nonspecific antibody (0/5).

conclusionsThe combination of clodronate liposomes and an active targeting antibody on the surface of gold nanoparticles allowed for PET/CT imaging of subcutaneous and orthotopic pancreatic xenografts in mice.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAnimalsFemaleGoldHumansImmunoconjugatesMetal NanoparticlesMiceMice, NudePancreatic NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadioisotopesTissue DistributionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysZirconiumGoldImmunoconjugatesRadioisotopesZirconiumZirconium-89Antibody-labeled nanoparticlesClodronate liposomesGold nanoparticlesPancreatic cancerPET/CT imagingRadiolabeled antibodyZirconium-89

Identifiers

PMID32909244
PMCPMC7785666
OpenAlexW3083877167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.