Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32909224›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2020

Estimating Catastrophic Health Expenditures from Household Surveys: Evidence from Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS)-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) from Sub-Saharan Africa.

Sarah Ssewanyana, Ibrahim Kasirye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah SsewanyanaEconomic Policy Research Centre (EPRC), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ibrahim KasiryeEconomic Policy Research Centre (EPRC), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. ikasirye@eprcug.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut of pocket (OOP) payments for healthcare remain a significant health financing challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the drivers and impacts of this financial health burden is both an economic and a public health priority.

objectiveThis study examines how the burden of OOP health expenditures varies with different thresholds for financial catastrophe.

methodsThe analysis is based on Livings Standards Measurement Surveys (LSMS)-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) for five SSA countries-Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda. We estimate the degree by which OOP payments as share of total household non-food expenditures exceed either the 15 or 25% threshold.

resultsFor the countries considered, the severity of OOP payments is substantial-the average positive overshoot (beyond the 25% threshold) is above 10%, except for Nigeria. This reflects a higher percentage of OOP in total household health expenditures-compared to taxes and contributions-especially among the poor in these specific countries. Regarding sensitivity of distribution of catastrophic health expenditures, we find that households with low non-food expenditures are more likely to incur catastrophic payments with the exception for Uganda where catastrophic payments increase with the increase of non-food household expenditures.

conclusionThe burden of catastrophic health expenditures remains large. In order to reduce this burden, public health expenditures need to be expanded as an alternative. This calls for renewed attention to expand public revenues as the most sustainable methods of financing health expenditures in Africa.

Indexed as

Catastrophic IllnessHealth ExpendituresAgricultureFinancing, PersonalHumansPovertySocioeconomic FactorsUganda

Identifiers

PMID32909224
PMCPMC7481041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.