Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32909162›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure.

Anju Devianee Keetharuth, Jakob Bue Bjorner, Michael Barkham, John Browne, Tim Croudace, John Brazier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Estimating a Preference-Based Index for Mental Health From the Recovering Quality of Life Measure: Valuation of Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anju Devianee KeetharuthSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. d.keetharuth@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-6806
Jakob Bue BjornerOptum Patient Insights, Rhode Island, United States and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7033-8224
Michael BarkhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6376
John BrowneSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-4336
Tim CroudaceSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8346-7463
John BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4780

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 104/0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 have been developed for use as outcome measures with individuals aged 16 and over, experiencing mental health difficulties. This paper reports modelling results from the item response theory (IRT) analyses that were used for item reduction.

methodsFrom several stages of preparatory work including focus groups and a previous psychometric survey, a pool of items was developed. After confirming that the ReQoL item pool was sufficiently unidimensional for scoring, IRT model parameters were estimated using Samejima's Graded Response Model (GRM). All 39 mental health items were evaluated with respect to item fit and differential item function regarding age, gender, ethnicity, and diagnosis. Scales were evaluated regarding overall measurement precision and known-groups validity (by care setting type and self-rating of overall mental health).

resultsThe study recruited 4266 participants with a wide range of mental health diagnoses from multiple settings. The IRT parameters demonstrated excellent coverage of the latent construct with the centres of item information functions ranging from - 0.98 to 0.21 and with discrimination slope parameters from 1.4 to 3.6. We identified only two poorly fitting items and no evidence of differential item functioning of concern. Scales showed excellent measurement precision and known-groups validity.

conclusionThe results from the IRT analyses confirm the robust structure properties and internal construct validity of the ReQoL instruments. The strong psychometric evidence generated guided item selection for the final versions of the ReQoL measures.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeItem response theoryMental healthPsychometricsRecovering quality of life

Identifiers

PMID32909162
PMCPMC7847872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.