ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
MRI of the ulnar nerve pre- and post-transposition: imaging features and rater agreement.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-guided therapeutic injection of the surgically transposed ulnar nerve at the elbow: sonographic appearances, technique and clinical follow-up.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Article
- The Unpredictable Ulnar Nerve-Ulnar Nerve Entrapment from Anatomical, Pathophysiological, and Biopsychosocial Aspects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: associations of pre-operative DTI parameters with clinical outcomes after cubital tunnel decompression.European radiology · 2023Article
- Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow on MRI: importance of the longitudinal extent of the hyperintense ulnar nerve.Skeletal radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDetermine the rater agreement of MRI features of the ulnar nerve pre- and post-transposition and association with recurrent symptoms. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective cohort analysis examined 23 subjects who underwent elbow MRI pre- and post-ulnar nerve transposition from 1999 to 2018, 10 of whom developed recurrent symptoms. Pre- and post-transposition MRIs were evaluated by two blinded radiologists for ulnar nerve cross-sectional area, signal intensity, fascicular architecture, caliber change, and perineural scar. Inter-rater agreement was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for continuous variables and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC) for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression modeling probed associations between imaging markers and symptom recurrence.
resultsThe ulnar nerve, post-operatively, demonstrated statistically significant increases in size (p < 0.001), signal intensity (p = 0.021), and abrupt caliber change (p = 0.024). None of the imaging features, except for higher signal intensity of the nerve pre-transposition as demonstrated by one rater, were predictive of symptom recurrence. Inter-rater agreement for cross-sectional area measurements of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel was excellent (ICCs of 0.91 and 0.83). Substantial-to-excellent inter-rater agreement was observed pre-operatively for nerve signal intensity, caliber change, and fascicular architecture. Post-operatively, agreement on nerve signal intensity and perineural scar was excellent (ACs of 0.90 and 0.88), but only slight for caliber change (0.15).
conclusionInter-rater agreement for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the ulnar nerve was generally robust. Post-transposition, the ulnar nerve was generally larger and more T2-hyperintense, but MRI features were not predictive of recurrent ulnar neuropathy, except for perhaps the signal intensity of the nerve pre-transposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.