ReviewDer Pathologe2020
[Fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of aggressive B-cell lymphomas].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvement of diagnosis in children with Burkitt lymphoma in Kenya: feasibility study for the implementation of fluorescenceEcancermedicalscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of new lymphoma entities that are defined by chromosomal rearrangements has led to changes concerning the diagnostic algorithms in routine hematopathology, particularly for the large group of aggressive B‑cell lymphomas. The new, genetically defined entity high-grade B‑cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double/triple hit lymphoma) is morphologically heterogenous and comprises lymphomas with the morphology of a diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but also cases with blastoid appearance as well as intermediate/Burkitt-like morphology. This implies a cytogenetic analysis for the final classification of aggressive lymphomas with DLBCL morphology, which constitute the most common lymphomas in daily practice. This analysis is currently most efficiently performed via a sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approach, with an initial MYC-FISH, that is followed (if required, i.e., if a MYC rearrangement is detected) by an analysis regarding a BCL2- and BCL6-chromosomal rearrangement. In addition, the update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification for hematopoietic neoplasms introduced additional lymphoma subgroups that are defined by chromosomal rearrangements, such as Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration as well as large B cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement. Therefore, FISH currently plays an important role in the diagnostic armamentarium in routine diagnostic hematopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.