Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908871›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Development of a New Lateral Flow Assay Based on IBMP-8.1 and IBMP-8.4 Chimeric Antigens to Diagnose Chagas Disease.

Edimilson D Silva, Ângelo A O Silva, Emily F Santos, Leonardo M Leony, Natália E M Freitas, Ramona T Daltro, Antônio G P Ferreira, Rafaela L Diniz, Aline R Bernardo, Alejandro O Luquetti and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Standardization of Serodiagnostic Methods for Trypanosoma cruzi.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of Cross-Reactivity of ChimericDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Performance of ChimericFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Chagas Immunochromatographic Rapid Test in the Serological Diagnosis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Edimilson D SilvaImmunobiological Technology Institute (Fiocruz/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ângelo A O SilvaGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.
Emily F SantosGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.
Leonardo M LeonyGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.
Natália E M FreitasGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.
Ramona T DaltroGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.
Antônio G P FerreiraImmunobiological Technology Institute (Fiocruz/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafaela L DinizImmunobiological Technology Institute (Fiocruz/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Aline R BernardoImmunobiological Technology Institute (Fiocruz/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alejandro O LuquettiCenter of Studies for Chagas Disease, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Marco A KriegerCarlos Chagas Institute (Fiocruz/PR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Paola A F CeledonMolecular Biology Institute of Paraná (IBMP), Curitiba, Brazil.
Pedro A ViñasChagas Disease Program, Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
Nilson I T ZanchinCarlos Chagas Institute (Fiocruz/PR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Fred L N SantosGonçalo Moniz Institute (Fiocruz/BA), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-0818
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná · BRFundação Carlos Chagas · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite several available methodologies for Chagas disease (CD) serological screening, the main limitation of chronic CD diagnosis is the lack of effective tools for large-scale screening and point-of-care diagnosis to be used in different CD epidemiological scenarios. Taking into account that developing such a diagnostic tool will significantly improve the ability to identify CD carriers, we aimed at performing a proof-of-concept study (phase I study) to assess the use of these proteins in a point-of-care platform using serum samples from different geographical settings of Brazil and distinct clinical presentations. The diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on a panel of two WHO International Standards (IS) and 14 sera from

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBrazilChagas DiseaseChromatography, AffinityEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEquipment DesignHumansImmunoassayPoint-of-Care TestingProof of Concept StudyProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32908871
PMCPMC7450325
OpenAlexW3075278688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.