Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908680›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2020

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Ling Ling, Yao Liu, Baixing Zhou, Feifei Gao, Zhe Hu, Man Tian, Yiqiao Xing, Kaibao Ji, Tao Sun, Wentian Zhou

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05875909 (Corneal Flap Transplantation for Macular Hole Repair of High Myopia), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05875909 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Corneal Flap Transplantation for Macular Hole Repair of High Myopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst People's Hospital of HangzhouRan2022 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsRetinal Perforations, Myopia, DegenerativeArmscorneal flap transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ling LingAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-4410
Yao LiuAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Baixing ZhouAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Feifei GaoAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Zhe HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Man TianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yiqiao XingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kaibao JiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7704-8438
Tao SunAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-3686
Wentian ZhouAffiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-5427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD).

methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses.

resultsIn total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;

conclusionsThus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes.

Identifiers

PMID32908680
PMCPMC7463360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.