ArticleEvolutionary applications2020
Evaluating the probability of CRISPR-based gene drive contaminating another species.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene drives, species complexes, and the risks of collateral damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Horizontal Gene Transfer in Plants and Implications for Biotechnology.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Eliminating malaria vectors with precision-guided sterile males.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Advances in bacteria-based drug delivery systems for anti-tumor therapy.Clinical & translational immunology · 2024Review
- Transformative Approaches for Sustainable Weed Management: The Power of Gene Drive and CRISPR-Cas9.Genes · 2023Review
- Eliminating Malaria Vectors with Precision Guided Sterile Males.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Chemical Ecology and Olfaction in Short-Horned Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae).Journal of chemical ecology · 2022Review
- Reflection on the Challenges, Accomplishments, and New Frontiers of Gene Drives.Biodesign research · 2022Review
- Selection of sites for field trials of genetically engineered mosquitoes with gene drive.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Article
- Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Can a Population Targeted by a CRISPR-Based Homing Gene Drive Be Rescued?G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Evaluating the probability of CRISPR-based gene drive contaminating another species.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The probability D that a given clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based gene drive element contaminates another, nontarget species can be estimated by the following Drive Risk Assessment Quantitative Estimate (DRAQUE) Equation:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.