ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2020
Antibacterial Potential of
Article in International journal of microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-vitro antimicrobial activity of Jatropha variegata Vahl. (Euphorbiaceae) against some pathogenic microbes isolated from clinical samples in Ibb City, Yemen.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leaf Extracts ofTheScientificWorldJournal · 2024Article
- Screening of Phytochemical, Antimicrobial, and Antioxidant Properties ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Characterization of Autochthonous Strains from the Cecal Content of Creole Roosters for a Potential Use as Probiotics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Caribbean Women's Health and Transnational Ethnobotany.Economic botany · 2022Article
- Functional Studies of Plant Latex as a Rich Source of Bioactive Compounds: Focus on Proteins and Alkaloids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Flavones fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the latex of three species members of
methodThe antibacterial activities were calculated based on the inhibition zones using the Mueller-Hinton agar diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using Mueller-Hinton broth in a microdilution method, and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) using blood agar plate.
resultsThe latex of
conclusionsThe latex of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.