Effects of Probiotics on the Expression of Cathelicidins in Response to Stimulation by

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Immunomodulation of Antimicrobial Peptides Expression in the Gastrointestinal Tract by Probiotics in Response to Stimulation by Salmonella minnesota Lipopolysaccharides.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021
   Article
2. Effects of ProbioticsThe journal of poultry science · 2020
   Article
3. Effect of antibiotic treatment on microbial composition and expression of antimicrobial peptides and cytokines in the chick cecum.Poultry science · 2020
   Article
4. Molecular characterization, mRNA gene expression, and antimicrobial activity of 2 new cathelicidin genes in goose.Poultry science · 2020
   Article
5. Effects of Oral Administration ofThe journal of poultry science · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as