Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908255›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

The survival impact of CKS1B gains or amplification is dependent on the background karyotype and TP53 deletion status in patients with myeloma.

Suyang Hao, Xinyan Lu, Zimu Gong, Roland L Bassett, Shimin Hu, Sergej N Konoplev, Guilin Tang, Shaoying Li, Jie Xu, Mahsa Khanlari and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Risk factors for multiple myeloma and its precursor diseases.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Suyang HaoDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, The Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Xinyan LuDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Zimu GongDepartment of Internal Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Roland L BassettDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shimin HuDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-3814
Sergej N KonoplevDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Guilin TangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shaoying LiDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-0523
Jie XuDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-3898
Mahsa KhanlariDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hans C LeeDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elisabet E ManasanchDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Donna M WeberDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert Z OrlowskiDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Pei LinDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. peilin@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMethodist Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USSaint Joseph Hospital · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gains or amplification (amp) of chromosome 1q21/CKS1B are reported to be a high-risk factor in myeloma. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the impact of CKS1B gain/amp on overall survival in the context of other genetic aberrations, such as TP53 deletion, FGFR3-IGH, IGH-MAF, MYEOV/CCND1-IGH, and RB1, as well as karyotype. The cohort included 132 myeloma patients with CKS1B gain/amp detected by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. There were 72 men and 60 women with a median age of 65 years (range 39-88 years). A normal, simple, or complex karyotype was observed in 39.5%, 5.4%, and 55% of patients, respectively. "Double hit," defined as CKS1B gain/amp coexisting with TP53 deletion, or "triple hit," defined as double hit plus t(4;14)FGFR3-IGH or t(14;16)IGH-MAF, were identified in 25 patients (18.9%) and five patients (3.8%), respectively. Double and triple hit were highly associated with a complex karyotype (p = 0.02). Ninety-nine patients (99/128, 77.3%) received stem cell transplantation. The median follow-up time was 48.2 months (range 2-104 months); 68 patients (51.5%) died, with a median overall survival of 58.8 months. Multivariate analysis (Cox model) showed that double hit with TP53 deletion (p = 0.0031), triple hit (p = 0.01), and complex karyotype (p = 0.0009) were each independently associated with poorer overall survival. Stem cell transplantation was associated with better overall survival, mainly in patients with a double or triple hit and complex karyotype (p = 0.003). These findings indicate that the inferior outcome of myeloma patients with CKS1B gain/amp is attributable to the high number of high-risk patients in this group. The prognostic impact of CKS1B gain/amp depends on the background karyotype and TP53 status.

Indexed as

Abnormal KaryotypeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCDC2-CDC28 KinasesChromosome AberrationsFemaleGene AmplificationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor Protein p53CDC2-CDC28 KinasesCKS1B protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32908255
OpenAlexW3083922057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.