Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908221›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Morphological and physiological factors contributing to early vigor in the elite rice cultivar 9,311.

Zai Shi, Tian-Gen Chang, Faming Chen, Honglong Zhao, Qingfeng Song, Mengyao Wang, Yanjie Wang, Zhiwei Zhou, Chongrong Wang, Shao-Chuan Zhou and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Zai Shi *National Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tian-Gen Chang *National Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China. changtiangen@sippe.ac.cn.
Faming ChenUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Honglong ZhaoNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qingfeng SongNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Mengyao WangNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yanjie WangNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhiwei ZhouHuazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Chongrong WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shao-Chuan ZhouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Baoshan WangKey Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Genyun ChenNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xin-Guang ZhuNational Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, CAS, Building No. 1, Room 402, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai, 200032, China. zhuxg@sippe.ac.cn.
Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNShandong Normal University · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Huanghuazhan (HHZ) and 9,311 are two elite rice cultivars in China. They have achieved high yield through quite different mechanisms. One of the major features that gives high yield capacity to 9,311 is its strong early vigor, i.e., faster establishment of its seedling as well as its better growth in its early stages. To understand the mechanistic basis of early vigor in 9,311, as compared to HHZ the cultivar, we have examined, under controlled environmental conditions, different morphological and physiological traits that may contribute to its early vigor. Our results show that the fresh weight of the seeds, at germination, not only determined the seedling biomass at 10 days after germination (DAG), but was also responsible for ~ 80% of variations in plant biomass between the two cultivars even up to 30 DAG. Furthermore, the 9,311 cultivar had a larger root system, which led to its higher nitrogen uptake capacity. Other noteworthy observations about 9,311 being a better cultivar than HHZ are: (i) Ten out of 15 genes involved in nitrogen metabolism were much more highly expressed in its roots; (ii) it had a higher water uptake rate, promoting better root-to-shoot nitrogen transfer; and (iii) consistent with the above, it had higher leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance. All of the above identified features explain, to a large extent, why the 9,311, as compared to HHZ, exhibits much more vigorous early growth.

Indexed as

NitrogenOryzaPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesSeedlingsNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID32908221
PMCPMC7481250
OpenAlexW3084139330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.