ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2020
Live biotherapeutic products: the importance of a defined regulatory framework.
Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
174 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Probiotics are beneficial for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Re-engineering insulin for oral delivery: structural modifications, advanced formulation strategies, and future directions.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Article
- Next-generation probiotic platforms for food nutrition: integrating functional foods with advanced delivery technologies.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Next-generation probiotics and microbiome-based therapeutics highlighting Akkermansia muciniphila and Amuc_1100.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- A barrier-centered perspective on the gut-barrier-bone axis: a review of the core role of the intestinal barrier and related probiotics with nanocoatings.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbiota-Mediator-Host Signaling Networks in Metabolic Syndrome: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Targeting.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Live Biotherapeutic Products (LBPs) as Promising Microbiome-Based Medicines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC): Mechanistic Basis, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Review
- Single-Step Chromosomal Engineering Integrates Biocontainment and Therapeutic Function for Regulatory-Oriented Live Biotherapeutic Chassis Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Spore-Forming Probiotic-Embedded Biomaterials for Targeted Gut Microplastic Biodegradation.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Repurposing azole antifungals as rapid bactericidal, membrane-disruptive therapeutics againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Next Generation Probiotics Challenges: A Road to use as Live Bio-Therapeutics.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Intra-tumoral microbiota: Key modulators of tumor immunity and therapeutic potential.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Carbadox, a veterinary growth promoter exhibits anticlostridial activity through induction of oxidative stress in Clostridioides difficile.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Transplantation of encapsulated fecal microbiota: research progress and future trends.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Review
- From "synthetic" to defined microbial communities for clearer terminology.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Probiotic Delivery Systems for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Recent Advances and Translational Challenges.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics have been defined as "Live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host". This definition covers a wide range of applications, target populations and (combinations of) microorganisms. Improved knowledge on the importance of the microbiota in terms of health and disease has further diversified the potential scope of a probiotic intervention, whether intended to reach the market as a food, a food supplement or a drug, depending on the intended use. However, the increased interest in the clinical application of probiotics may require specific attention given their administration in a diseased population. In addition to safety, the impact of the type of product, in terms of quality, production method and, e.g., the acceptance of side effects, is now part of the current regulatory constraints for developers. In the European Union, foods are regulated by the European Food Safety Authority and drugs by the European Medicines Agency; in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) deals with both categories. More recently, the FDA has defined a new "live biotherapeutic products" (LBP) category, clarifying pharmaceutical expectations. Since 2019, the quality requirements for this category of drug products have also been clarified by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). Similar to all products intended to prevent or treat diseases, LBPs will have to be registered as medicinal products to reach the market in the US and in Europe. In this area, regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry will routinely use guidelines of the "International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use" (ICH). Although ICH guidelines are not legally binding, they provide very important recommendations, recognized by almost all drug authorities in the world. In this review, we discuss some aspects of this regulatory framework, especially focusing on products with an intended use in a diseased or vulnerable target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.