Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908212›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2020

Live biotherapeutic products: the importance of a defined regulatory framework.

Magali Cordaillat-Simmons, Alice Rouanet, Bruno Pot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magali Cordaillat-Simmons *Pharmabiotic Research Institute (PRI), 1 Quai Vallière, Résidence l´île verte, 11100, Narbonne, France.
Alice Rouanet *Pharmabiotic Research Institute (PRI), 1 Quai Vallière, Résidence l´île verte, 11100, Narbonne, France.
Bruno Pot *Pharmabiotic Research Institute (PRI), 1 Quai Vallière, Résidence l´île verte, 11100, Narbonne, France. bruno.pot@vub.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have been defined as "Live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host". This definition covers a wide range of applications, target populations and (combinations of) microorganisms. Improved knowledge on the importance of the microbiota in terms of health and disease has further diversified the potential scope of a probiotic intervention, whether intended to reach the market as a food, a food supplement or a drug, depending on the intended use. However, the increased interest in the clinical application of probiotics may require specific attention given their administration in a diseased population. In addition to safety, the impact of the type of product, in terms of quality, production method and, e.g., the acceptance of side effects, is now part of the current regulatory constraints for developers. In the European Union, foods are regulated by the European Food Safety Authority and drugs by the European Medicines Agency; in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) deals with both categories. More recently, the FDA has defined a new "live biotherapeutic products" (LBP) category, clarifying pharmaceutical expectations. Since 2019, the quality requirements for this category of drug products have also been clarified by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). Similar to all products intended to prevent or treat diseases, LBPs will have to be registered as medicinal products to reach the market in the US and in Europe. In this area, regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry will routinely use guidelines of the "International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use" (ICH). Although ICH guidelines are not legally binding, they provide very important recommendations, recognized by almost all drug authorities in the world. In this review, we discuss some aspects of this regulatory framework, especially focusing on products with an intended use in a diseased or vulnerable target population.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsBiological TherapyDrug DevelopmentGuidelines as TopicHumansLegislation, DrugProbioticsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID32908212
PMCPMC8080583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.