Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32908192›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Infant gut microbiota characteristics generally do not modify effects of lipid-based nutrient supplementation on growth or inflammation: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Malawi.

Riley L Hughes, Charles D Arnold, Rebecca R Young, Per Ashorn, Ken Maleta, Yue-Mei Fan, Ulla Ashorn, David Chaima, Chikondi Malamba-Banda, Mary E Kable and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MGM as a Large-Scale Pretrained Foundation Model for Microbiome Analyses in Diverse Contexts.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Riley L HughesDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Charles D ArnoldDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Rebecca R YoungDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Per AshornCenter for Child Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ken MaletaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Yue-Mei FanCenter for Child Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ulla AshornCenter for Child Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
David ChaimaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Chikondi Malamba-BandaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mary E KableImmunity and Disease Prevention, Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Davis, CA, USA.
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. kgdewey@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Malawi · MWTampere University · FITampere University · FIWestern Human Nutrition Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An unhealthy gut microbial community may act as a barrier to improvement in growth and health outcomes in response to nutritional interventions. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether the infant microbiota modified the effects of a randomized controlled trial of lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) in Malawi on growth and inflammation at 12 and 18 months, respectively. We characterized baseline microbiota composition of fecal samples at 6 months of age (n = 506, prior to infant supplementation, which extended to 18 months) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V4 region. Features of the gut microbiota previously identified as being involved in fatty acid or micronutrient metabolism or in outcomes relating to growth and inflammation, especially in children, were investigated. Prior to correction for multiple hypothesis testing, the effects of LNS on growth appeared to be modified by Clostridium (p-for-interaction = 0.02), Ruminococcus (p-for-interaction = 0.007), and Firmicutes (p-for-interaction = 0.04) and effects on inflammation appeared to be modified by Faecalibacterium (p-for-interaction = 0.03) and Streptococcus (p-for-interaction = 0.004). However, after correction for multiple hypothesis testing these findings were not statistically significant, suggesting that the gut microbiota did not alter the effect of LNS on infant growth and inflammation in this cohort.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDietary SupplementsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInflammationLipidsMalawiMaleMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMicronutrientsMothersNutritional StatusLipidsMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID32908192
PMCPMC7481312
OpenAlexW3084072994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.