ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2020
Locus-specific analysis of DNA methylation patterns in cloned and in vitro fertilized porcine embryos.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial distribution of maternal factors in pig mature oocytes.Animal biotechnology · 2024Article
- DNA methylation regulates RNA mCell proliferation · 2024Article
- Regulation of α-Ketoglutarate levels byFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Whole-genome methylation analysis reveals epigenetic variation between wild-type and nontransgenic cloned, ASMT transgenic cloned dairy goats generated by the somatic cell nuclear transfer.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Meta-analysis of melatonin treatment and porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryo development.Animal reproduction · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is currently inefficient, as 1-3.95% of reconstructed embryos survive to term; inadequate or erroneous epigenetic reprogramming of the specialized donor somatic nucleus could be a primary reason. Therefore, a locus-specific analysis of DNA methylation dynamics in embryogenesis and the DNA methylation status of gametes and donor cells used for SCNT were conducted in the following developmentally important gene loci: POU5F1, NANOG, SOX2, H19, IGF2, IGF2R, XIST; and the retrotransposon LINE-1. There were significant epigenetic differences between the gametes and the somatic donor cells. Three gamete-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in POU5F1, XIST, and LINE-1 were identified. A delayed demethylation process at POU5F1 and LINE-1 loci occurred after three successive cleavages, compared to the in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. Although cloned embryos could undergo de-methylation and re-methylation dynamics at the DMRs of imprinted genes (H19, IGF2R, and XIST), the re-methylation process was compromised, unlike in fertilized embryos. LINE-1 loci are widely dispersed across the whole genome, and LINE-1 DMR might be a potential porcine nuclear reprogramming epi-marker. Data from observations in our present and previous studies, and two published articles were pooled to produce a schematic diagram of locus-specific, DNA methylation dynamics of cloned and IVF embryos during porcine early embryogenesis. This also indicated aberrant DNA methylation reprogramming events, including inadequate DNA demethylation and insufficient re-methylation in cloned embryos. Further research should focus on mechanisms underlying demethylation during the early cleavage of embryos and de novo DNA methylation at the blastocyst stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.