Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32907958›Full record

ArticleNeurology2020

The subcortical basis of outcome and cognitive impairment in TBI: A longitudinal cohort study.

Evan S Lutkenhoff, Matthew J Wright, Vikesh Shrestha, Courtney Real, David L McArthur, Manuel Buitrago-Blanco, Paul M Vespa, Martin M Monti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Computational Prognostic Modeling in Traumatic Brain Injury.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Significant Acceleration of Regional Brain Aging and Atrophy After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient-Centered Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Acute TBI.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan S LutkenhoffFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Matthew J WrightFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Vikesh ShresthaFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Courtney RealFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
David L McArthurFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Manuel Buitrago-BlancoFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Paul M VespaFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA.
Martin M MontiFrom the Department of Psychology (E.S.L., M.M.M.) and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.J.W.), University of California Los Angeles; Brain Injury Research Center (E.S.L., M.J.W., V.S., C.R., D.L.M., M.B.-B., P.M.V., M.M.M.), Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Neurology (M.B.-B, P.M.V., M.M.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (M.J.W.), Torrance, CA. monti@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5511-3780
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Public Engagement CoreU54NS100064 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ENGEL, JEROME NONE, GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2017 to 2021
$21.7M
The effects of glycemic control on post-traumatic brain metabolismP01NS058489 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUTTON, RICHARD L. · 2009 to 2013
$6.2M
MRS Detects Metabolic Dysfunction after Brain InjuryR01NS049471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI VESPA, PAUL M · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS058489NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049471NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how, biologically, the acute event of traumatic brain injury gives rise to a long-term disease, we address the relationship between evolving cortical and subcortical brain damage and measures of functional outcome and cognitive functioning at 6 months after injury.

methodsFor this longitudinal analysis, clinical and MRI data were collected in a tertiary neurointensive care setting in a continuous sample of 157 patients surviving moderate to severe traumatic brain injury between 2000 and 2018. For each patient, we collected T1- and T2-weighted MRI data acutely and at the 6-month follow-up, as well as acute measures of injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale), follow-up measures of functional impairment (Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended), and, in a subset of patients, neuropsychological measures of attention, executive functions, and episodic memory.

resultsIn the final cohort of 113 subcortical and 92 cortical datasets that survived (blind) quality control, extensive atrophy was observed over the first 6 months after injury across the brain. However, only atrophy within subcortical regions, particularly in the left thalamus, was associated with functional outcome and neuropsychological measures of attention, executive functions, and episodic memory. Furthermore, when brought together in an analytical model, longitudinal brain measurements could distinguish good from bad outcome with 90% accuracy, whereas acute brain and clinical measurements alone could achieve only 20% accuracy.

conclusionDespite great injury heterogeneity, secondary thalamic pathology is a measurable minimum common denominator mechanism directly relating biology to clinical measures of outcome and cognitive functioning, potentially linking the acute event and the longer-term disease of traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttentionBrainBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID32907958
PMCPMC7682912
OpenAlexW3084473728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.