Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32907905›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence.

Lucy Karwatowska, Simon Russell, Francesca Solmi, Bianca Lucia De Stavola, Sara Jaffee, Jean-Baptiste Pingault, Essi Viding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy KarwatowskaGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK lucy.karwatowska.18@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-5190
Simon RussellGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Francesca SolmiDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-9503
Bianca Lucia De StavolaGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sara JaffeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jean-Baptiste PingaultDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Essi VidingDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council ES/P000347/1Wellcome Trust 209196/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313.

Indexed as

Conduct DisorderProblem BehaviorAdolescentAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPublic HealthReview Literature as TopicRisk Factorschild & adolescent psychiatryepidemiologypersonality disordersstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID32907905
PMCPMC7482491
OpenAlexW3084081277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.