Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.
Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 630 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk Stratification of COVID-19 Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department
Relationship Between Delirium Severity by CAM-ICU 7 and 4C Mortality Score of the COVID-19 Patients in ICU
Who cites it
630 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Predictor Composition, Outcomes, Risk of Bias, and Validation of COVID-19 Prognostic Scores.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Pooled it
- Global prevalence and effect of comorbidities and smoking status on severity and mortality of COVID-19 in association with age and gender: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Levels of circulating kidney injury markers and IL-10 identify non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 at risk of death.JCI insight · 2026Trial
- sST2 is a key outcome biomarker in COVID-19: insights from discovery randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effects of Losartan on Patients Hospitalized for Acute COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Trial
- Viral and Host Factors Are Associated With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 outcomes on remdesivir according to baseline 4C mortality score.Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2023Trial
- Article
- Myocardial Injury and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Severe or Critical COVID-19: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Article
- LongitudinalJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Translating machine learning predictions into meaningful risk estimates to support clinical decisions: a post hoc analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease adverse outcomes using unified auto clinical scores.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Predicting Failure at Initiation of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Patients With COVID-19: Literature Review, Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Observational
- Admission Laboratory-Based Prediction of Six-Month Mortality After COVID-19 Hospitalization: Model Development, Bootstrap Internal Validation, and Single-Center Temporal Validation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Serum desmosine served as a biomarker for severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Wave-aware mortality prediction in COVID-19: a multi-stage feature selection and explainable machine-learning framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face Consultation in Fighting COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study of Adult Patients With COVID-19 in a Primary Care Setting.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- ICU Admission and Post-Discharge Mortality in COVID-19: Different Risk Factors Across Clinical Phases.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
570 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a pragmatic risk score to predict mortality in patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19).
designProspective observational cohort study.
settingInternational Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK (CCP-UK) study (performed by the ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium-ISARIC-4C) in 260 hospitals across England, Scotland, and Wales. Model training was performed on a cohort of patients recruited between 6 February and 20 May 2020, with validation conducted on a second cohort of patients recruited after model development between 21 May and 29 June 2020
main outcome measureIn-hospital mortality.
results35 463 patients were included in the derivation dataset (mortality rate 32.2%) and 22 361 in the validation dataset (mortality rate 30.1%). The final 4C Mortality Score included eight variables readily available at initial hospital assessment: age, sex, number of comorbidities, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, level of consciousness, urea level, and C reactive protein (score range 0-21 points). The 4C Score showed high discrimination for mortality (derivation cohort: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.79; validation cohort: 0.77, 0.76 to 0.77) with excellent calibration (validation: calibration-in-the-large=0, slope=1.0). Patients with a score of at least 15 (n=4158, 19%) had a 62% mortality (positive predictive value 62%) compared with 1% mortality for those with a score of 3 or less (n=1650, 7%; negative predictive value 99%). Discriminatory performance was higher than 15 pre-existing risk stratification scores (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range 0.61-0.76), with scores developed in other covid-19 cohorts often performing poorly (range 0.63-0.73).
conclusionsAn easy-to-use risk stratification score has been developed and validated based on commonly available parameters at hospital presentation. The 4C Mortality Score outperformed existing scores, showed utility to directly inform clinical decision making, and can be used to stratify patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 into different management groups. The score should be further validated to determine its applicability in other populations. STUDY REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66726260.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.