Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32907633›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

The threat of reduced efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep from an area considered anthelmintic resistance-free.

Antonio Bosco, Jan Kießler, Alessandra Amadesi, Marian Varady, Barbara Hinney, Davide Ianniello, Maria Paola Maurelli, Giuseppe Cringoli, Laura Rinaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parasite diversity in grey wolves (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of parasitology research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of pomegranate (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonio BoscoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy.
Jan KießlerInstitute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Alessandra AmadesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy.
Marian VaradyInstitute of Parasitology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Barbara HinneyInstitute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Davide IannielloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy.
Maria Paola MaurelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe CringoliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy.
Laura RinaldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Naples, Italy. lrinaldi@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-2052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe worldwide increased difficulty to combat gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection in sheep, due to progressing anthelmintic resistance (AR), calls for an enhanced and standardized implementation of early detection of AR. This study provides a snapshot of the current AR status against benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones in southern Italy, generated with standardized techniques.

methodsOn 10 sheep farms, the efficacy of albendazole (ALB) and either eprinomectin (EPR) or ivermectin (IVM) was evaluated based on the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) performed with the Mini-FLOTAC. For each tested drug, 40 sheep were rectally sampled at D0 and sampled again 14 days after the treatment (D14). The FECRT was calculated from individual samples and pooled samples which consist of 5 individual samples. Efficacy was classified as 'reduced, 'suspected' and 'normal'. Coprocultures were set for D0 and D14 faecal samples of each group. From farms with FECR < 95%, an in vitro egg hatch test (EHT) and a follow-up FECRT using fenbendazole (FBZ) were conducted.

resultsBased on the FECR, high efficacy (from 95.7% to 100%) was observed for ALB and IVM in eight farms (Farms 3-10). On Farm 1 and Farm 2, the efficacy for the macrocyclic lactones was classified as 'normal', but 'reduced' efficacy was observed for ALB on Farm 1 (FECR = 75%) and 'suspected' efficacy on Farm 2 (FECR = 93.3%) with the predominant GIN genus Trichostrongylus followed by Haemonchus at D14. The FEC results of pooled samples strongly correlated with those of individual samples, for FEC at D0 (r

conclusionsIn regions like southern Italy, where the negative impacts from AR have played a minor role, efficient monitoring of AR is important in order to evaluate potential risks and being able to promptly respond with countermeasures.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAnimalsAnthelminticsBenzimidazolesFarmsFecesFenbendazoleGastrointestinal DiseasesHaemonchusItalyIvermectinNematodaNematode InfectionsParasite Egg CountSheepSheep DiseasesAnthelminticsBenzimidazoleseprinomectinFenbendazoleIvermectinAnthelmintic resistanceEgg hatch testFaecal egg count reduction testGastrointestinal nematodesPooling faecal samplesSheep

Identifiers

PMID32907633
PMCPMC7487796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.