Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32907498›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2021

Putting the Pieces in Place: Mobilizing Cellular Players to Improve Annulus Fibrosus Repair.

Ana P Peredo, Sarah E Gullbrand, Harvey E Smith, Robert L Mauck

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Advances and Prospects in Biomaterials for Intervertebral Disk Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana P PeredoDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sarah E GullbrandMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Harvey E SmithMcKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert L MauckDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechano-active annular repair device for treating disc herniationI21RX003447 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, HARVEY E. · 2020 to 2023
–
RRD VA I01 RX002274RRD VA I21 RX003447RRD VA IK2 RX001476RRD VA IK2 RX003118RRD VA IK6 RX003416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intervertebral disc (IVD) is an integral load-bearing tissue that derives its function from its composite structure and extracellular matrix composition. IVD herniations involve the failure of the annulus fibrosus (AF) and the extrusion of the nucleus pulposus beyond the disc boundary. Disc herniations can impinge the neural elements and cause debilitating pain and loss of function, posing a significant burden on individual patients and society as a whole. Patients with persistent symptoms may require surgery; however, surgical intervention fails to repair the ruptured AF and is associated with the risk for reherniation and further disc degeneration. Given the limitations of AF endogenous repair, many attempts have been made toward the development of effective repair approaches that reestablish IVD function. These methods, however, fail to recapitulate the composition and organization of the native AF, ultimately resulting in inferior tissue mechanics and function over time and high rates of reherniation. Harnessing the cellular function of cells (endogenous or exogenous) at the repair site through the provision of cell-instructive cues could enhance AF tissue regeneration and, ultimately, improve healing outcomes. In this study, we review the diverse approaches that have been developed for AF repair and emphasize the potential for mobilizing the appropriate cellular players at the site of injury to improve AF healing. Impact statement Conventional treatments for intervertebral disc herniation fail to repair the annulus fibrosus (AF), increasing the risk for recurrent herniation. The lack of repair devices in the market has spurred the development of regenerative approaches, yet most of these rely on a scarce endogenous cell population to repair large injuries, resulting in inadequate regeneration. This review identifies current and developing strategies for AF repair and highlights the potential for harnessing cellular function to improve AF regeneration. Ideal cell sources, differentiation strategies, and delivery methods are discussed to guide the design of repair systems that leverage specialized cells to achieve superior outcomes.

Indexed as

Annulus FibrosusIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementHumansWound Healingannulus fibrosusbiomaterialscell deliverycellular functionintervertebral disc herniationregeneration

Identifiers

PMID32907498
PMCPMC10799291
OpenAlexW3084462951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.