Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32907475›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2020

National Trends in Outpatient Mental Health Service Use Among Adults Between 2008 and 2015.

Hayley D Germack, Coleman Drake, Julie M Donohue, Ezra Golberstein, Susan H Busch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Slavery and Its Afterlives in US Psychiatry.American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Trend in rural-urban disparities in access to outpatient mental health services among US adults aged 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance: 2005-2018.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hayley D GermackDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh (Germack); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (Drake, Donohue); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Golberstein); Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (Busch).
Coleman DrakeDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh (Germack); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (Drake, Donohue); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Golberstein); Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (Busch).
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh (Germack); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (Drake, Donohue); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Golberstein); Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (Busch).
Ezra GolbersteinDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh (Germack); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (Drake, Donohue); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Golberstein); Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (Busch).
Susan H BuschDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh (Germack); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (Drake, Donohue); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Golberstein); Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (Busch).
Department of Health · TW

Funding

Young adults, health care use and psychosisR01MH106635 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BUSCH, SUSAN H · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study sought to characterize recent trends in mental health visits of adult outpatients to primary care physicians (PCPs), specialty mental health providers (SMHPs), and other providers (non-primary care physicians, specialists other than SMHPs, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants). Trends determined by degree of patients' psychological distress and in the types of treatments received within different settings were also examined.

methodsData were from the household component of the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the 2008-2011 and 2012-2015 periods for adults ages ≥18 years (N=13,111) who had a mental health outpatient visit. Bivariate logistic regression was used to compare means between the two periods.

resultsThe percentage of adults having mental health outpatient visits increased between the two periods, largely driven by an increase in visits with providers other than SMHPs and PCPs, which rose from 11.9% (N=667) to 15.5% (N=1,048). Outpatient mental health visits with PCPs decreased from 29.0% (N=1,802) to 26.8% (N=1,945). The proportion of respondents with mental health outpatient visits increased both among those with high psychological distress and among those with low or no psychological distress (from 30.7% [N=1,332] to 36.2% [N=1,491] and from 6.0% [N=4,516] to 6.9% [N=5,772], respectively). The percentage of respondents receiving only psychotropic medication decreased over the two periods.

conclusionsMental health outpatient visits for adults increased between 2008 and 2015, and visits with SMHPs remained relatively stable during that time. A greater understanding of recent trends in types of outpatient mental health services may help identify targets for future mental health workforce studies.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesOutpatientsAdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareHealth Care SurveysHumansPsychotropic DrugsUnited StatesPsychotropic DrugsAdult mental healthCommunity psychiatryMental health workforceOutpatient mental healthOutpatient treatment

Identifiers

PMID32907475
PMCPMC7877566
OpenAlexW3086919273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.