Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32906702›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Attitudes and Approaches to Use of Meal Replacement Products among Healthcare Professionals in Management of Excess Weight.

Gabrielle Maston, Janet Franklin, Alice A Gibson, Elisa Manson, Samantha Hocking, Amanda Sainsbury, Tania P Markovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Brown Rice, Meal Replacements, and Anti-Obesity Drugs on Mitochondria in Obese Rats.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle MastonFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-1508
Janet FranklinMetabolism & Obesity Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Alice A GibsonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-9720
Elisa MansonMetabolism & Obesity Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Samantha HockingFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Amanda SainsburyFaculty of Science, School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9176-1574
Tania P MarkovicFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Charles Perkins Centre, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meal replacement product-based diets are an effective weight loss intervention used in the management of obesity. Historically, these diets have been underutilised by HealthCare Professionals (HCPs). An online survey of mixed methods design was distributed to HCPs to capture current perceptions and prescribing patterns of meal replacement products (MRPs) in the management of overweight and obesity. A total of 303 HCPs working in weight management across Australia began the survey and 197 (65%) completed it. While over 70% of HCPs have prescribed MRP currently or in the past, MRPs are only prescribed to a median 7% of patients seeking weight management treatment. Qualitative analysis identified potential barriers to MRP prescription, which include experience with patient non-compliance, perceived poor long-term weight loss durability and safety concerns regarding the product and its use as a total meal replacement program. Safety concerns are centred on the perceived risk of weight cycling and its potential negative psychological impact. MRP prescription is 66% more likely to occur if HCPs had formal training in the use of MRPs relative to those who did not, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.7 (95% CI 1.4, 2.0). This study highlights the potential barriers to the prescription of MRPs, which are centred around safety concerns. This also indicates that formal training may enhance the likelihood of prescribing MRPs, suggesting that once HCPs have a comprehensive understanding of the products and the evidence behind their use, their prescription is likely to be increased.

Indexed as

dietlow-energy liquid dietobesityqualitativereducingvery-low-energy dietweight management

Identifiers

PMID32906702
PMCPMC7551264
OpenAlexW3083338831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.