A Fresh Look at Grape Powdery Mildew (

Anett Csikós, Márk Z Németh, Omer Frenkel, Levente Kiss, Kálmán Zoltán Váczy

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

6citing papers in PubMed

1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?Studies in mycology · 2024
Article
Comprehensive analyses of the occurrence of a fungicide resistance marker and the genetic structure in Erysiphe necator populations.Scientific reports · 2023
Article
Disease Forecasting for the Rational Management of Grapevine Mildews in the Chianti Bio-District (Tuscany).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
Article
Phenotyping for QTL identification: A case study of resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022
Review
Ampelomyces strains isolated from diverse powdery mildew hosts in Japan: Their phylogeny and mycoparasitic activity, including timing and quantifying mycoparasitism of Pseudoidium neolycopersici on tomato.PloS one · 2021
Article
Confirmation and Fine Mapping of the Resistance LocusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anett CsikósFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly University, H-3300 Eger, Hungary.

Márk Z NémethPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-8421

Omer FrenkelDepartment of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.

Levente KissPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4785-4308

Kálmán Zoltán VáczyFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly University, H-3300 Eger, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-5887

Eszterhazy Karoly Catholic University · HUAgricultural Research Organization · ILCentre for Agricultural Research · HUUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

European Regional Development Fund and the Hungarian Government GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00061

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

overwinteringpopulation structuresympatric genetic differentiationtemporal isolationvineyardsVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID32906683

DOI10.3390/plants9091156

PMCPMC7570353

OpenAlexW3083639949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.