Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32906682›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Peptides from Different Carcass Elements of Organic and Conventional Pork-Potential Source of Antioxidant Activity.

Paulina Kęska, Sascha Rohn, Michał Halagarda, Karolina M Wójciak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Individual and Joint Effect ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. To Be or Not to Be… An Antioxidant? That Is the Question.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulina KęskaDepartment of Animal Raw Materials Technology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20033 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-2025
Sascha RohnHamburg School of Food Science, Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Michał HalagardaDepartment of Food Product Quality, Cracow University of Economics, 31510 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-0353
Karolina M WójciakDepartment of Animal Raw Materials Technology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20033 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4202-433X
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PLKrakow University of Economics · PLUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego 029/RID/2018/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing consumer interest in organic foods, as well as, in many cases, the inconclusiveness of the research comparing organic and conventional foods, indicates a need to study this issue further. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of meat origin (conventional vs. organic) and selected elements of the pork carcass (ham, loin, and shoulder) on the meat proteome and the antioxidant potential of its peptides. The peptidomic approach was used, while the ability of antioxidants to scavenge 2,2'-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), to chelate Fe(II) ions, and to reduce Fe(III) was determined. Most peptides were derived from myofibrillary proteins. The meat origin and the element of the pork carcass did not have a significant effect on the proteome. On the other hand, the pork origin and the carcass element significantly affected the iron ion-chelating capacity (Fe(II)) and the reducing power of peptides. In particular, pork ham from conventional rearing systems had the best antioxidant properties in relation to potential antioxidant peptides. This could be a factor for human health, as well as for stabilized meat products (e.g., toward lipid oxidation).

Indexed as

antioxidant peptideselement of pork carcassesspectrometric analysis

Identifiers

PMID32906682
PMCPMC7554766
OpenAlexW3083587644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.