Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32906644›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2020

Printed Electrodes in Microfluidic Arrays for Cancer Biomarker Protein Detection.

Lasangi Dhanapala, Colleen E Krause, Abby L Jones, James F Rusling

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lasangi DhanapalaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-0934
Colleen E KrauseDepartment of Chemistry, University of Hartford, Bloomfield Ave., West Hartford, CT 06117, USA.
Abby L JonesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
James F RuslingDepartment of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-3306
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Hartford · US

Funding

Protein Biomarker Arrays for Personalized Treatment of Prostate CancerR01EB016707 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI RUSLING, JAMES F. · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB016707University of Connecticut Acadmic Plan grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical diagnostics is trending towards a more personalized future approach in which multiple tests can be digitized into patient records. In cancer diagnostics, patients can be tested for individual protein and genomic biomarkers that detect cancers at very early stages and also be used to monitor cancer progression or remission during therapy. These data can then be incorporated into patient records that could be easily accessed on a cell phone by a health care professional or the patients themselves on demand. Data on protein biomarkers have a large potential to be measured in point-of-care devices, particularly diagnostic panels that could provide a continually updated, personalized record of a disease like cancer. Electrochemical immunoassays have been popular among protein detection methods due to their inherent high sensitivity and ease of coupling with screen-printed and inkjet-printed electrodes. Integrated chips featuring these kinds of electrodes can be built at low cost and designed for ease of automation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) features are adopted in most of these ultrasensitive detection systems, with microfluidics allowing easy manipulation and good fluid dynamics to deliver reagents and detect the desired proteins. Several of these ultrasensitive systems have detected biomarker panels ranging from four to eight proteins, which in many cases when a specific cancer is suspected may be sufficient. However, a grand challenge lies in engineering microfluidic-printed electrode devices for the simultaneous detection of larger protein panels (e.g., 50-100) that could be used to test for many types of cancers, as well as other diseases for truly personalized care.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesElectrodesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGoldHumansImmunoassayLab-On-A-Chip DevicesLimit of DetectionNeoplasmsPoint-of-Care SystemsBiomarkers, TumorGoldbiomarkerscancerimmunoassaysinkjet-printed electrodesproteinscreen-printed electrodes

Identifiers

PMID32906644
PMCPMC7559629
OpenAlexW3083565580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.