Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32906200›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2020

Cytogenetically visible inversions are formed by multiple molecular mechanisms.

Maria Pettersson, Christopher M Grochowski, Josephine Wincent, Jesper Eisfeldt, Amy M Breman, Sau W Cheung, Ana C V Krepischi, Carla Rosenberg, James R Lupski, Jesper Ottosson and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Benchmark for simple and complex genome inversions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria PetterssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-1625
Christopher M GrochowskiDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-7720
Josephine WincentDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper EisfeldtDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3716-4917
Amy M BremanDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sau W CheungDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ana C V KrepischiDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla RosenbergDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
James R LupskiDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-9246
Jesper OttossonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lovisa LovmarDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jelena GacicDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Elisabeth S LundbergDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia M B CarvalhoDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-298X
Anna LindstrandDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-5602
Karolinska University Hospital · SEBaylor College of Medicine · USSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRIndiana University School of MedicineLinköping University Hospital · SEPacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute · USScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

STRUCTURAL VARIATION IN NEUROLOGICAL DISEASER35NS105078 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2018 to 2025
$6.0M
Uncovering inversion formation in the human genome and its impact to disease.R01GM132589 · NIGMS · PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FONSECA, CLAUDIA CARVALHO · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Discovery and functional characterization of genic variants leading to Robinow syndrome and related skeletal dysplasias.R03HD092569 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FONSECA, CLAUDIA CARVALHO, SUTTON, VERNON R · 2018 to 2019
$238k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD092569NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132589NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS105078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetically detected inversions are generally assumed to be copy number and phenotypically neutral events. While nonallelic homologous recombination is thought to play a major role, recent data suggest the involvement of other molecular mechanisms in inversion formation. Using a combination of short-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS), 10X Genomics Chromium WGS, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization we investigated the genomic structure of 18 large unique cytogenetically detected chromosomal inversions and achieved nucleotide resolution of at least one chromosomal inversion junction for 13/18 (72%). Surprisingly, we observed that seemingly copy number neutral inversions can be accompanied by a copy-number gain of up to 350 kb and local genomic complexities (3/18, 17%). In the resolved inversions, the mutational signatures are consistent with nonhomologous end-joining (8/13, 62%) or microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (5/13, 38%). Our study indicates that short-read 30x coverage WGS can detect a substantial fraction of chromosomal inversions. Moreover, replication-based mechanisms are responsible for approximately 38% of those events leading to a significant proportion of inversions that are actually accompanied by additional copy-number variation potentially contributing to the overall phenotypic presentation of those patients.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGene FrequencyHaplotypesHeterozygoteHomologous RecombinationHumansKaryotypingMalePedigreeWhole Genome Sequencingchromosomal inversionsnonallelic homologous recombinationnonhomologous end-joiningrecombinant chromosomesreplication-based repair mechanismswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32906200
PMCPMC7702065
OpenAlexW3085108261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.