ArticleActa haematologica2021
Presence of Parvovirus B19 but Not Herpesvirus Genome in Acute Skin Rash after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Correlates with Outcome.
Article in Acta haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSkin rash is a first symptom of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) but can also be caused by viruses. The relevance of virus DNA analyses in skin rash for diagnosis and clinical outcome is unknown.
objectivesTo record the frequencies of detection of herpes and parvovirus B19 (ParvoB19) DNA in skin rash within 100 days after ASCT and to analyze their relevance for diagnosis, clinical course, and non-relapse mortality (NRM).
methodsWe retrospectively identified 55 patients with virus DNA analysis for CMV, EBV, HHV6, HHV8, HSV, VZV, or ParvoB19. We assessed the rate of virus DNA detection and studied associations with histological diagnosis, virus DNA from concomitantly analyzed blood, clinical presentation, exanthema treatment, and NRM.
resultsCMV, EBV, HHV6, HHV8, HSV, VZV and ParvoB19 DNA were detected in 12.5, 11.8, 10, 0, 0, 2.9, and 26.7% of exanthemas. Histopathological diagnosis was not associated with virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results. Detection of CMV, EBV, or HHV6 DNA but not ParvoB19 in skin and blood was associated with PCR results (p = 0.016; p < 0.001; p = 0.067; p = n.a.). Detection of CMV, EBV, HHV6, or ParvoB19 DNA in the skin was not significantly associated with patient, ASCT, or GvHD characteristics. Detection of ParvoB19 but not herpes virus DNA was associated with less immunosuppressive treatment (p = 0.015) and lower NRM (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, detection of ParvoB19 was associated with a lower NRM.
conclusionsDetection of ParvoB19 DNA in exanthema after ASCT might be associated with lower NRM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.