Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905864›Full record

SynthesisPsychiatry research2020

PTSD treatment in times of COVID-19: A systematic review of the effects of online EMDR.

L I M Lenferink, K Meyerbröker, P A Boelen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychiatry research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L I M LenferinkDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Electronic address: l.i.m.lenferink@uu.nl.
K MeyerbrökerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Altrecht Academic Anxiety Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands.
P A BoelenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 affects many societies by measures as "social distancing", forcing mental health care professionals to deliver treatments online or via telephone. In this context, online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an emerging treatment for patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). We performed a systematic review of studies investigating online EMDR for PTSD. Only one trial was identified. That uncontrolled open trial showed promising results. There is an urgent need to further examine the effects of online EMDR for PTSD, before its wider dissemination is warranted. Remotely delivered cognitive behavioural therapy seems the preferred PTSD-treatment in times of COVID-19.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralCognitive Behavioral TherapyCOVID-19Eye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingHumansSARS-CoV-2Social IsolationStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTelemedicineEmdrInternetPtsd

Identifiers

PMID32905864
PMCPMC7458053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.