Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905735›Full record

ReviewVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2020

Considerations for Human Blood-Feeding and Arthropod Exposure in Vector Biology Research: An Essential Tool for Investigations and Disease Control.

Laura C Harrington, Brian D Foy, Michael J Bangs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Batch RearingCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura C HarringtonDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Brian D FoyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Pathology, Arthropod-Borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory Fort Collins, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Michael J BangsPublic Health & Malaria Control, PT Freeport Indonesia/International SOS, Kuala Kencana, Indonesia.

Funding

New Targets for Reproductive Control of Mosquito VectorsR01AI095491 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura C Harrington, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2011 to 2026
$7.3M
Repeat Ivermectin Mass Drug Administrations for MALaria control II (RIMDAMAL II): a double-blind cluster randomized trial for integrated control of malariaU01AI138910 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FOY, BRIAN DAVID, PARIKH, SUNIL · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Zika virus urogenital tropism, pathogenesis and sexual transmissionR21AI129464 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FOY, BRIAN DAVID · 2017 to 2018
$377k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095491NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI129464NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI138910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eventually there may be a broadly acceptable, even perfected, substitute for the human host requirement for direct feeding experiments by arthropods, most notably mosquitoes. However, for now, direct and indirect feeding on human volunteers is an important, if not essential, tool in vector biology research (VBR). This article builds on the foundational publication by Achee et al. (2015) covering considerations for the use of human participants in VBR pursuits. The authors introduced methods involving human participation in VBR, while detailing human-landing collections (catches) as a prime example. Benedict et al. (2018) continued this theme with an overview of human participation and considerations for research that involves release of mosquito vectors into the environment. In this study, we discuss another important aspect of human use in VBR activities: considerations addressing studies that require an arthropod to feed on a live human host. Using mosquito studies as our principal example, in this study, we discuss the tremendous importance and value of this approach to support and allow study of a wide variety of factors and interactions related to our understanding of vector-borne diseases and their control. This includes establishment of laboratory colonies for test populations, characterization of essential nutrients that contribute to mosquito fitness, characterization of blood-feeding (biting) behavior and pathogen transmission, parameterization for modeling transmission dynamics, evaluation of human host attraction and/or agents that repel, and the effectiveness of antivector or parasite therapeutic drug studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropodsArthropod VectorsEthics Committees, ResearchFeeding BehaviorHumansResearch PersonnelVector Borne Diseasesbiosafetyethicshuman hosthuman subjectsvector biology researchvector-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID32905735
PMCPMC7698847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.