Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905729›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2020

Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation.

Alexander R Vaccaro, Jonathan A Harris, Mir M Hussain, Rishi Wadhwa, Victor W Chang, Samuel R Schroerlucke, Walter P Samora, Peter G Passias, Rakesh D Patel, Ripul R Panchal and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A feasibility cadaver study for placing screws in various pelvic osseous fracture pathways using a robotic arm.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  19. Assessment of the tolerance angle for pedicle screw insertion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexander R VaccaroRothman Institute, 6559Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-0796
Jonathan A HarrisMusculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of 110044Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-5480
Mir M HussainMusculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of 110044Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA, USA.
Rishi Wadhwa21771UCSF Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Victor W Chang2971Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8580-0706
Samuel R SchroerluckeTabor Orthopedics, Division of MSK Group PC, Memphis, TN, USA.
Walter P SamoraNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Peter G PassiasHospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Rakesh D Patel1259University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ripul R Panchal21772University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sabino D'Agostino2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Nathaniel L WhitneyInland Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Spokane, WA, USA.
Neil R CrawfordMusculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of 110044Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA, USA.
Brandon S BucklenMusculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of 110044Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCadaveric study.

objectiveTo evaluate accuracy, radiation exposure, and surgical time of a new robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) platform compared with freehand techniques in conventional open and percutaneous procedures.

methodsTen board-certified surgeons inserted 16 pedicle screws at T10-L5 (n = 40 per technique) in 10 human cadaveric torsos. Pedicle screws were inserted with (1) conventional MIS technique (L2-L5, patient left pedicles), (2) MIS RAN (L2-L5, patient right pedicles), (3) conventional open technique (T10-L1, patient left pedicles), and (4) open RAN (T10-L1, patient right pedicles). Output included (1) operative time, (2) number of fluoroscopic images, and (3) screw accuracy.

resultsIn the MIS group, compared with the freehand technique, RAN allowed for use of larger screws (diameter: 6.6 ± 0.6 mm vs 6.3 ± 0.5 mm; length: 50.3 ± 4.1 mm vs 46.9 ± 3.5 mm), decreased the number of breaches >2 mm (0 vs 7), fewer fluoroscopic images (0 ± 0 vs 108.3 ± 30.9), and surgical procedure time per screw (3.6 ± 0.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 2.0 minutes) (all

conclusionRAN significantly improved accuracy and decreased radiation exposure in comparison to freehand techniques in both conventional open and percutaneous surgical procedures in cadavers. RAN significantly increased setup time compared with both conventional procedures.

Indexed as

cadavericcomputer-assisted navigationpedicle screwsscrew accuracysurgical robotics

Identifiers

PMID32905729
PMCPMC7485081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.