Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905545›Full record

ArticleChildren and youth services review2020

Adolescent perceptions about participating in HIV-related research studies.

A P Simons-Rudolph, B J Iritani, F S Odongo, S Rennie, A Gilbertson, D Kwaro, W K Luseno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children and youth services review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A P Simons-RudolphPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Chapel Hill, USA.
B J IritaniPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Chapel Hill, USA.
F S OdongoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
S RennieDepartment of Social Medicine, UNC Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
A GilbertsonPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Chapel Hill, USA.
D KwaroKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
W K LusenoPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

Ethics of HIV-Related Research Involving Adolescents in KenyaR01MH102125 · NIMH · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI LUSENO, WINFRED K · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising incidence of infection among youth in sub-Saharan Africa makes HIV-related research among younger people a top priority. There remains, however, a lack of consistent and unambiguous ethical principles and guidance for researchers wishing to conduct HIV studies with adolescents. The overarching aim of our research was to better understand youths' experiences with HIV studies. The present study explored four questions: (1) What strategies are effective for recruiting youth for HIV studies? (2) What motivates youth to participate in these studies? (3) How do study participants perceive HIV testing within the context of a research study? (4) What do participants understand about the risks of study participation? These data are essential to inform guidelines for the responsible conduct of research with young people. We interviewed 82 adolescents (aged 15-19) in Kenya taking part in a study examining ethical issues pertaining to their involvement in HIV-related research. Pursuant to our research questions, we found that direct study recruitment combined with encouragement from female relatives was the greatest facilitator to study enrolment among young people. Most young participants expressed that they were motivated to join the study in order to (1) learn their HIV status (n = 49) and (2) receive HIV-related education (n = 26), even though both are already free and widely available. Participants largely preferred testing in a place they deemed "private," although both the health clinic and home were regarded by adolescents as locations with greater privacy. Adolescents largely did not accurately perceive risks of the study two months after baseline, although they could remember the benefits with great clarity. This work can inform researchers, policymakers, and ethics review committees on approaches to maximize efficiency in recruitment and data collection, and to enhance understanding of risks and benefits in HIV-related research among adolescents. While further research is needed, these data may be used by others conducting HIV research in this region to improve recruitment strategies and more effectively engage and appeal to young people.

Indexed as

AdolescentsEthicsHIVKenyaParticipationRecruitmentResearch

Identifiers

PMID32905545
PMCPMC7472997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.