Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905524›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2020

Deep learning for inferring transcription factor binding sites.

Peter K Koo, Matt Ploenzke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Designing DNA With Tunable Regulatory Activity Using Discrete Diffusion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. ProPr54 web server: predicting σNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. InterpretingNature machine intelligence · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. InterpretingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advancing Regulatory Genomics With Machine Learning.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter K KooSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Matt PloenzkeDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is a powerful tool for predicting transcription factor binding sites from DNA sequence. Despite their high predictive accuracy, there are no guarantees that a high-performing deep learning model will learn causal sequence-function relationships. Thus a move beyond performance comparisons on benchmark datasets is needed. Interpreting model predictions is a powerful approach to identify which features drive performance gains and ideally provide insight into the underlying biological mechanisms. Here we highlight timely advances in deep learning for genomics, with a focus on inferring transcription factors binding sites. We describe recent applications, model architectures, and advances in

Indexed as

Deep learninginterpretabilitymotifsneural networkstranscription factor binding

Identifiers

PMID32905524
PMCPMC7469942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.