Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905440›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computer science2020

Integration of the ImageJ Ecosystem in the KNIME Analytics Platform.

Christian Dietz, Curtis T Rueden, Stefan Helfrich, Ellen T A Dobson, Martin Horn, Jan Eglinger, Edward L Evans, Dalton T McLean, Tatiana Novitskaya, William A Ricke and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A community-based approach to image analysis of cells, tissues and tumors.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian DietzKNIME GmbH, Konstanz, Germany.
Curtis T RuedenLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation (LOCI), Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Stefan HelfrichKNIME GmbH, Konstanz, Germany.
Ellen T A DobsonLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation (LOCI), Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Martin HornUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Jan EglingerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Edward L EvansMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Institute for Molecular Virology, and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Dalton T McLeanGeorge M. O'Brien Center of Research Excellence, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA.
Tatiana NovitskayaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
William A RickeGeorge M. O'Brien Center of Research Excellence, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA.
Nathan M ShererMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Institute for Molecular Virology, and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Andries ZijlstraDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael R BertholdKNIME GmbH, Konstanz, Germany.
Kevin W EliceiriLaboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation (LOCI), Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Role of Beta-Catenin in Urinary DysfunctionU54DK104310 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MACOSKA, JILL A., MARKER, PAUL C · 2014 to 2023
$12.8M
Training in Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA009135 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, WILLIAM M. · 1985 to 2024
$10.4M
The Cell Biology of HIV-1 Genome TraffickingR01AI110221 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathan M Sherer · 2014 to 2026
$4.4M
High-throughput palmitoyl-proteomics profiling of extracellular vesicles for identification of biomarkers for early detection of clinically significant prostate cancerR01CA218526 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DI VIZIO, DOLORES, HURLEY, PAULA JILL · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
ImageJ as an extensible image processing frameworkRC2GM092519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELICEIRI, KEVIN WILLIAM · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218526NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009135NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110221NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK104310NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM092519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-source software tools are often used for analysis of scientific image data due to their flexibility and transparency in dealing with rapidly evolving imaging technologies. The complex nature of image analysis problems frequently requires many tools to be used in conjunction, including image processing and analysis, data processing, machine learning and deep learning, statistical analysis of the results, visualization, correlation to heterogeneous but related data, and more. However, the development, and therefore application, of these computational tools is impeded by a lack of integration across platforms. Integration of tools goes beyond convenience, as it is impractical for one tool to anticipate and accommodate the current and future needs of every user. This problem is emphasized in the field of bioimage analysis, where various rapidly emerging methods are quickly being adopted by researchers. ImageJ is a popular open-source image analysis platform, with contributions from a global community resulting in hundreds of specialized routines for a wide array of scientific tasks. ImageJ's strength lies in its accessibility and extensibility, allowing researchers to easily improve the software to solve their image analysis tasks. However, ImageJ is not designed for development of complex end-to-end image analysis workflows. Scientists are often forced to create highly specialized and hard-to-reproduce scripts to orchestrate individual software fragments and cover the entire life-cycle of an analysis of an image dataset. KNIME Analytics Platform, a user-friendly data integration, analysis, and exploration workflow system, was designed to handle huge amounts of heterogeneous data in a platform-agnostic, computing environment and has been successful in meeting complex end-to-end demands in several communities, such as cheminformatics and mass spectrometry. Similar needs within the bioimage analysis community led to the creation of the KNIME Image Processing extension which integrates ImageJ into KNIME Analytics Platform, enabling researchers to develop reproducible and scalable workflows, integrating a diverse range of analysis tools. Here we present how users and developers alike can leverage the ImageJ ecosystem via the KNIME Image Processing extension to provide robust and extensible image analysis within KNIME workflows. We illustrate the benefits of this integration with examples, as well as representative scientific use cases.

Indexed as

Bioimagingcomputational workflowsFijiimage analysisImageJinteroperabilityKNIMEopen-source

Identifiers

PMID32905440
PMCPMC7469687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.