Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905412›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2020

Clinical parameters predicting complications in native kidney biopsies.

Björn Peters, Salmir Nasic, Mårten Segelmark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biopsying Diabetics … How Risky Is It?Kidney international reports · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Kidney biopsy in the elderly: diagnostic adequacy and yield.International urology and nephrology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Björn PetersDepartment of Nephrology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Salmir NasicResearch and Development Centre (FoU) at Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Mårten SegelmarkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Nephrology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal biopsies are essential in nephrology but they are invasive and complications can occur. The aim of this study was to explore clinical parameters that can be used as predictors for biopsy complications.

methodsClinical parameters such as demographics, biopsy indications, serology, comorbidities and clinical chemistry were retrieved from a regional biopsy registry between 2006 and 2015 and from a nationwide registry between 2015 and 2017. Clinical data before biopsy were compared with data on major biopsy complications. Fisher's exact and

resultsIn total, 2835 consecutive native kidney biopsies were analysed (39% women and 61% men, median age 57 years). No death and nephrectomy due to biopsy complications were registered. The frequency of major biopsy complications was 5.65%. In the multiple logistic regression, the risk for complications increased in women [OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.08-2.11)] and decreased with age: 45-64 years age group [OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.44-0.99)] and >74 years age group [OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.27-0.96)]. Among comorbidities, patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.15-3.72)] and non-ischaemic heart disease [OR 3.20 (95% CI 1.64-6.25)] had a higher risk for major biopsy complications.

conclusionsFemale gender, younger age (≤44 years), diabetes mellitus type 2 and non-ischaemic heart disease were found as risk factors for major biopsy complications.

Indexed as

biopsy complicationsclinical parametersmajor complicationsnative kidney biopsyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32905412
PMCPMC7467621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.