Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905183›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Perspectives about Professionalism among Undergraduate Students in a Medical College in India: A Qualitative Study.

Prasad Tukaram Dhikale, Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Srikanth Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prasad Tukaram DhikaleDepartment of Community Medicine, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackrey Medical College and Dr. R N Cooper Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Saurabh RamBihariLal ShrivastavaDepartment of Community Medicine, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth - Deemed to be University, Ammapettai, Nellikuppam, Chengalpet District, Tamil Nadu, India.
Srikanth SrinivasanDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessionalism has been recognized as an important competency of a doctor by various regulatory bodies.

objectivesThe purpose of the study was to explore the perceptions of medical undergraduate students and to assess their attitude on professionalism. MATERIALS AND

methodsIt was a qualitative study in which four focus group discussions were conducted, one for each year of course.

resultsA total of seven themes emerged after the qualitative analysis of the data, namely qualities of a good doctor, need of teaching professionalism, ways of learning professionalism by medical students, ways of teaching professionalism, assessment of professionalism, factors promoting professionalism, and factors hindering professionalism. The students perceived that a good doctor should be committed to excellence, responsive and accountable to patients, profession and community, selfless, healthy, good communicator, ethical and law abiding, practice integrity, and social justice. The students preferred to learn professionalism by role modeling by faculties and case-based scenario discussions.

conclusionMedical undergraduate students should be briefed about the need and importance of professionalism through small-group discussions involving narratives, case scenarios, and role modeling by faculty. Professionalism of both students and faculties should be assessed and appropriate action taken.

Indexed as

Medical educationperspectivesprofessional identity developmentprofessionalismrole modelsundergraduate medical students

Identifiers

PMID32905183
PMCPMC7467191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.