Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32905045›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Medicine2020

Combined Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid and Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2 following Emergence of D614G Spike Variant.

Petra Mlcochova, Dami Collier, Allyson Ritchie, Sonny M Assennato, Myra Hosmillo, Neha Goel, Bo Meng, Krishna Chatterjee, Vivien Mendoza, Nigel Temperton and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antiviral Effects of Secondary Metabolites fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Petra MlcochovaCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Dami CollierCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Allyson RitchieDiagnostics for the Real World EU, Chesterford Research Park, UK.
Sonny M AssennatoDiagnostics for the Real World EU, Chesterford Research Park, UK.
Myra HosmilloDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neha GoelDiagnostics for the Real World EU, Chesterford Research Park, UK.
Bo MengCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Krishna ChatterjeeNIHR Cambridge Clinical Research Facility, Cambridge, UK.
Vivien MendozaNIHR Cambridge Clinical Research Facility, Cambridge, UK.
Nigel TempertonViral Pseudotype Unit, Medway School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Leo KissMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Leo C JamesMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Katarzyna A CiazynskaMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Xiaoli XiongMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
John A G BriggsMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
James A NathanCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Federica MesciaCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Laura BergamaschiCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Hongyi ZhangClinical Microbiology & Public Health Laboratory, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Petros BarmpounakisDepartment of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece.
Nikos DemerisDepartment of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece.
Richard SkellsNIHR Cambridge Clinical Research Facility, Cambridge, UK.
Paul A LyonsCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
John BradleyDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Steven BakerCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Jean Pierre AllainDiagnostics for the Real World EU, Chesterford Research Park, UK.
Kenneth G C SmithCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Rachel BousfieldDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Michael WilsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Dominic SparkesDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Glenn AmorosoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Effrosyni Gkrania-KlotsasDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Susie HardwickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Adrian BoyleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge University NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Ian GoodfellowDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ravindra K GuptaCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease-National Institute of Health Research (CITIID-NIHR) COVID BioResource Collaboration
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBDiagnostics for the Real World (United Kingdom) · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBMedway School of Pharmacy · GBNIHR Wellcome Trust Southampton Clinical Research Facility · GBAthens University of Economics and Business · GR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701652Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/16Medical Research Council U105181010Wellcome Trust 200594/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid COVID-19 diagnosis in the hospital is essential, although this is complicated by 30%-50% of nose/throat swabs being negative by SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). Furthermore, the D614G spike mutant dominates the pandemic and it is unclear how serological tests designed to detect anti-spike antibodies perform against this variant. We assess the diagnostic accuracy of combined rapid antibody point of care (POC) and nucleic acid assays for suspected COVID-19 disease due to either wild-type or the D614G spike mutant SARS-CoV-2. The overall detection rate for COVID-19 is 79.2% (95% CI 57.8-92.9) by rapid NAAT alone. The combined point of care antibody test and rapid NAAT is not affected by D614G and results in very high sensitivity for COVID-19 diagnosis with very high specificity.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedNeutralization TestsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2COVID-19D614Gpoint of care testingrapid diagnosesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32905045
PMCPMC7462534
OpenAlexW3081800406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.