ReviewiScience2020
Immune Literacy: Reading, Writing, and Editing Adaptive Immunity.
Review in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing learning, confidence, and retention in the immunology classroom with LEGO.ImmunoHorizons · 2026Article
- HAIRpred: Prediction of human antibody interacting residues in an antigen from its primary structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Bottom-up synthetic immunology.Nature nanotechnology · 2024Review
- The multilevel extensive diversity across the cynomolgus macaque captured by ultra-deep adaptive immune receptor repertoire sequencing.Science advances · 2024Article
- Current advancements in B-cell receptor sequencing fast-track the development of synthetic antibodies.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Barcoding intracellular reverse transcription enables high-throughput phenotype-coupled T cell receptor analyses.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Immune Literacy: a Call to Action for a System-Level Change.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023Article
- Persistent virus-specific and clonally expanded antibody-secreting cells respond to induced self-antigen in the CNS.Acta neuropathologica · 2023Article
- Single-cell immune repertoire sequencing of B and T cells in murine models of infection and autoimmunity.Genes and immunity · 2022Article
- The immuneML ecosystem for machine learning analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoires.Nature machine intelligence · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Animal immunization merges with innovative technologies: A new paradigm shift in antibody discovery.mAbsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in reading, writing, and editing DNA are providing unprecedented insights into the complexity of immunological systems. This combination of systems and synthetic biology methods is enabling the quantitative and precise understanding of molecular recognition in adaptive immunity, thus providing a framework for reprogramming immune responses for translational medicine. In this review, we will highlight state-of-the-art methods such as immune repertoire sequencing, immunoinformatics, and immunogenomic engineering and their application toward adaptive immunity. We showcase novel and interdisciplinary approaches that have the promise of transforming the design and breadth of molecular and cellular immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.