ReviewCureus2020
Therapeutic Strategies for Human Epidermal Receptor-2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor deposits in axillary adipose tissue in patients with breast cancer: Do they matter?World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Anti-HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate (PF-06804103) in Patients with HER2-Expressing Solid Tumors: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a frequently occurring malignancy in women. Immunologically, breast cancers can be classified into four subtypes depending on the types of receptors present and their expression profiles. These are estrogen positive, progesterone positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) positive, and triple-negative as identified by immunohistochemistry. This classification is the basis of response to treatment, prognosis, and survival. With the identification of HER2 receptor overexpression, targeted therapies with anti-HER2 agents have been developed. The first-line therapy approved for HER2 positive tumors is trastuzumab and pertuzumab linked to taxane and further treatment with an antibody-drug conjugate to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Tyrosine kinase overexpression can be treated with lapatinib, which has also been approved for improving survival and is used in combination with capecitabine. Acquired resistance in HER2 positive tumors is shown in many cases due to genetic or epigenetic modifications. Therefore, it is very important to plan therapeutic strategies and design effective treatment approaches. For a long time, only two agents, trastuzumab and lapatinib, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HER2 positive breast cancers. There has been no appropriate treatment for trastuzumab resistance and its failure to reduce tumor growth. Lapatinib was approved by the FDA in 2007 for HER2 positive breast cancer. Three existing therapy options after trastuzumab resistance was proposed by clinicians: continuation of trastuzumab, starting therapy with lapatinib, and the synergistic use of trastuzumab and lapatinib. There have been several effective therapies proposed for HER2 positive breast cancers in correlation with clinical trials. Discovering the mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance would increase its response to therapy and better clinical outcome. Clinicians are being continuously challenged by the resistance mechanisms and bioavailability of the drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast cancers. The addition of new drugs to the chemotherapeutic regimen increases the complexity, burden of side effects, and chances of relapse. Novel anti-HER2 agents have been directed towards therapy making a major paradigm shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.