Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32904968›Full record

ArticlePediatric reports2020

Testing of Braden QD Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Jayanti Dwi Puspitasari, Nani Nurhaeni, Fajar Tri Waluyanti

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05406986 (The Effect of Care Bundle in Preventing Pressure Ulcers Caused by Medical Devices in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05406986 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Care Bundle in Preventing Pressure Ulcers Caused by Medical Devices in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorKilis 7 Aralik UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsPressure Ulcer, Nursing Caries, Device Induced InjuryArmscare bundle application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment tools for the risk of pressure injury in children: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jayanti Dwi PuspitasariFaculty of Nusing, Universitas Indonesia.
Nani NurhaeniFaculty of Nusing, Universitas Indonesia.
Fajar Tri WaluyantiFaculty of Nusing, Universitas Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for pressure injury due to immobility and the challenge of positioning medical devices. However, a comprehensive instrument to assess pressure injury risk is still finite. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Braden QD Scale. The design used was a Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha (α). Fifty-one pediatric patients below age 18 who had been bedridden for at least 24 hours were engaged through a

Indexed as

Braden QD scalePICUpressure injury riskreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32904968
PMCPMC7463138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.