Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32904829›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Subspecialized radiology reporting: productivity and impact on the turnaround times for radiology reports in a middle-income country.

Nupur Verma, Gabriel Sartori Pacini, Juliana Pastorino Torrada, Diogo Martins de Oliveira, Matheus Zanon, Edson Marchiori, Tan-Lucien Mohammed, Bruno Hochhegger

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nupur VermaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-8132
Gabriel Sartori PaciniMedical Imaging Research Lab (Labimed), Department of Radiology, Pavilhão Pereira Filho Hospital, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-7082
Juliana Pastorino TorradaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-6704
Diogo Martins de OliveiraSchool of Medicine, Graduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0896-0810
Matheus ZanonMedical Imaging Research Lab (Labimed), Department of Radiology, Pavilhão Pereira Filho Hospital, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-5125
Edson MarchioriFederal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-7380
Tan-Lucien MohammedDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-6578
Bruno HochheggerMedical Imaging Research Lab (Labimed), Department of Radiology, Pavilhão Pereira Filho Hospital, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-4636
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Florida · USPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect that transitioning from a model of general radiology reporting to one of subspecialized radiology reporting has on report turnaround times (TATs) and on productivity in the radiology department of a hospital in a middle-income country. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe reporting workflow in our radiology department was changed from general reporting (any radiologist reporting imaging studies for any specialty) to subspecialized reporting (radiologists exclusively reporting imaging studies that fall within their subspecialty-abdominal, musculoskeletal, cardiothoracic, emergency, or neurological imaging). This was a retrospective study in which we compared general reporting with subspecialized reporting in terms of the following variables: the TAT; the proportions of reports completed within 2 h and within 24 h (TAT-2h and TAT- 24 h, respectively); and productivity. Data were collected over two 24-month periods (2015-2016 for general reporting and 2017-2018 for subspecialized reporting).

resultsA total of 208,516 reports were generated. The median report TAT decreased from 49.1 h and 52.9 h in 2015 and 2016, respectively, to 16.1 h and 15.2 h in 2017 and 2018, respectively (

conclusionThe implementation of a subspecialized reporting system significantly improved the median TAT for radiology reports, as well as increasing the TAT-2h and TAT- 24 h, during a time of increased productivity.

Indexed as

Medical records/standardsRadiologists/classificationRadiology department, hospital/organization & administrationRadiology information systems/standardsRadiology/organization & administrationSpecialization/trends

Identifiers

PMID32904829
PMCPMC7458564
OpenAlexW3043490753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.