Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32904778›Full record

ArticleQuantum information processing2020

Noisy three-player dilemma game: robustness of the quantum advantage.

Pranav Kairon, Kishore Thapliyal, R Srikanth, Anirban Pathak

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quantum information processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pranav KaironDelhi Technological University, Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042 India.
Kishore ThapliyalRCPTM, Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacky University and Institute of Physics of Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
R SrikanthPoornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560080 India.
Anirban PathakJaypee Institute of Information Technology, A-10, Sector-62, Noida, UP-201309 India.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-2588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Games involving quantum strategies often yield higher payoff. Here, we study a practical realization of the three-player dilemma game using the superconductivity-based quantum processors provided by IBM Q Experience. We analyze the persistence of the quantum advantage under corruption of the input states and how this depends on parameters of the payoff table. Specifically, experimental fidelity and error are observed not to be properly anti-correlated; i.e., there are instances where a class of experiments with higher fidelity yields a greater error in the payoff. Further, we find that the classical strategy will always outperform the quantum strategy if corruption is higher than 50%.

Indexed as

Effect of noise on quantum advantagesExperimental realization of a quantum gameQuantum gameThree-party dilemma game

Identifiers

PMID32904778
PMCPMC7458494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.